Literature DB >> 9050724

Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1995 membership survey.

J F Hulka1, B S Levy, W H Parker, J M Phillips.   

Abstract

A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the AAGL to determine the current performance of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), and to assess the relative frequencies of techniques and complications. Answers of the 1092 members who responded were entered into a database computer program and analyzed. The analysis revealed 14,911 LAVHs performed by 767 members. Complication rates appeared to be in the same range as those reported for vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. Inferior epigastric injury was the most common complication. Physicians showed a shift in their practices away from abdominal hysterectomy after they learned LAVH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9050724     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(97)80005-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  15 in total

1.  Radiofrequency energy antenna coupling to common laparoscopic instruments: practical implications.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Jennifer R McHenry; Christina L Dunn; Paul N Montero; Henry R Govekar; Greg V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue?

Authors:  Henry R Govekar; Thomas N Robinson; Greg V Stiegmann; Francis T McGreevy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Unintended stray energy from monopolar instruments: beware the dispersive electrode cord.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Nicole A Nadlonek; Edward L Jones; Jennifer R McHenry; Bruce Dunne; Gregory V Stiegmann; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of unintentional thermal injury from the monopolar "Bovie" instrument in comparison with traditional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Edward L Jones; Doug Overbey; Bruce Dunne; Jennifer McHenry; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Insulation failure in electrosurgery instrumentation: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Floriane Tixier; Mélanie Garçon; Françoise Rochefort; Stéphane Corvaisier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Bhoyrul; J Payne; B Steffes; L Swanstrom; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Paul N Montero; Thomas N Robinson; John S Weaver; Greg V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Quantifying inadvertent thermal bowel injury from the monopolar instrument.

Authors:  Kimberly E Martin; Camille M Moore; Robert Tucker; Pascal Fuchshuber; Thomas Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Blend mode reduces unintended thermal injury by laparoscopic monopolar instruments: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Christina L Dunn; Nicole T Townsend; Teresa S Jones; J Bruce Dunne; Paul N Montero; Henry R Govekar; Greg V Stiegmann; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Principles and safety measures of electrosurgery in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Thoralf Schollmeyer; Nusrat A Hawaldar; Nidhi Sharma; Liselotte Mettler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.