Literature DB >> 19572175

Insulation failure in laparoscopic instruments.

Paul N Montero1, Thomas N Robinson, John S Weaver, Greg V Stiegmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrosurgery is used in virtually every laparoscopic operation. In the early days of laparoscopic surgery, capacitive coupling, associated with hybrid trocars, was thought to be the major cause of laparoscopic electrosurgery injuries. Modern laparoscopy has reduced capacitive coupling, and now insulation failure is thought to be the main cause of electrosurgical complications. The aim of this study was (1) to determine the incidence of insulation failures, (2) to compare the incidence of insulation failure in reusable and disposable instruments, and (3) to determine the location of insulation failures.
METHODS: At four major urban hospitals, reusable laparoscopic instruments were checked for insulation failure using a high-voltage porosity detector. Disposable L-hooks were collected following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and similarly evaluated for insulation failure. Instruments were determined to have insulation failure if 2.5 kV crossed the instrument's insulation to create a closed loop circuit. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact or chi(2) analysis (*denotes significance set at p < 0.05).
RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six laparoscopic instruments were tested (165 reusable). Insulation failure occurred more often in reusable (19%; 31/165) than in disposable instruments (3%; 2/61; *p < 0.01). When reusable sets were evaluated, 71% (12/17) were found to have at least one instrument with insulation failure. Insulation failure incidence in reusable instruments was similar between hospitals that routinely checked for insulation failure (19%; 25/130) and hospitals that do not routinely check for insulation failures (33%; 7/21; p = 0.16). Insulation failure was most common in the distal third of the instruments (54%; 25/46) compared to the middle or proximal third of the instruments (*p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: One in five reusable laparoscopic instruments has insulation failure; a finding that is not altered by whether the hospital routinely checks for insulation defects. Disposable instruments have a lower incidence of insulation failure. The distal third of laparoscopic instruments is the most common site of insulation failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572175     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0601-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

Review 1.  Complications and recommended practices for electrosurgery in laparoscopy.

Authors:  M P Wu; C S Ou; S L Chen; E Y Yen; R Rowbotham
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Education and engineering solutions for potential problems with laparoscopic monopolar electrosurgery.

Authors:  C R Voyles; R D Tucker
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Recommended practices for electrosurgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.676

4.  Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Ned Cosgriff; Douglas P Slakey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 5.  Active electrode monitoring. How to prevent unintentional thermal injury associated with monopolar electrosurgery at laparoscopy.

Authors:  T G Vancaillie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Port site electrosurgical (diathermy) burns during surgical laparoscopy.

Authors:  P D Willson; J D van der Walt; D Moxon; J Rogers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1995 membership survey.

Authors:  J F Hulka; B S Levy; W H Parker; J M Phillips
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1997-02

8.  Essential principles of electrosurgery in operative laparoscopy.

Authors:  A A Luciano; R M Soderstrom; D C Martin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1994-05

9.  Laparoscopic capacitance: a mystery measured. Experiments in pigs with confirmation in the engineering laboratory.

Authors:  C M Grosskinsky; R M Ryder; H M Pendergrass; J F Hulka
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Deaths associated with laparoscopic sterilization by unipolar electrocoagulating devices, 1978 and 1979.

Authors:  H B Peterson; H W Ory; J R Greenspan; C W Tyler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-01-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  21 in total

1.  Radiofrequency energy antenna coupling to common laparoscopic instruments: practical implications.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Jennifer R McHenry; Christina L Dunn; Paul N Montero; Henry R Govekar; Greg V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue?

Authors:  Henry R Govekar; Thomas N Robinson; Greg V Stiegmann; Francis T McGreevy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Unintended stray energy from monopolar instruments: beware the dispersive electrode cord.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Nicole A Nadlonek; Edward L Jones; Jennifer R McHenry; Bruce Dunne; Gregory V Stiegmann; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stray energy transfer in single-incision robotic surgery.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Wikiel; Douglas M Overbey; Heather Carmichael; Brandon C Chapman; John T Moore; Carlton C Barnett; Teresa S Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Edward L Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of unintentional thermal injury from the monopolar "Bovie" instrument in comparison with traditional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Edward L Jones; Doug Overbey; Bruce Dunne; Jennifer McHenry; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Reprocessed single-use devices in laparoscopy: assessment of cost, environmental impact, and patient safety.

Authors:  David Renton; Peter Denk; Oliver Varban
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Occult risk of broken instruments for endoscopy-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuhara; Kazuhiko Fukatsu; Takami Komatsu; Satoshi Murakoshi; Yuhei Saito; Yushi Uetera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The safe use of surgical energy devices by surgeons may be overestimated.

Authors:  Ally Ha; Carly Richards; Erik Criman; Jillian Piaggione; Christopher Yheulon; Robert Lim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose.

Authors:  P Fuchshuber; S Schwaitzberg; D Jones; S B Jones; L Feldman; M Munro; T Robinson; G Purcell-Jackson; D Mikami; A Madani; M Brunt; B Dunkin; C Gugliemi; L Groah; R Lim; J Mischna; C R Voyles
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Quantifying inadvertent thermal bowel injury from the monopolar instrument.

Authors:  Kimberly E Martin; Camille M Moore; Robert Tucker; Pascal Fuchshuber; Thomas Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.