Nicole T Townsend1, Nicole A Nadlonek2, Edward L Jones3, Jennifer R McHenry4, Bruce Dunne4, Gregory V Stiegmann2, Thomas N Robinson2,5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. nicole.townsend@ucdenver.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Covidien, Boulder, CO, USA. 5. VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, 1055 Clermont St, Denver, CO, 80220, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The monopolar instrument emits stray radiofrequency energy from its cord when activated. This is a source of unintended thermal injury to patients. Stray energy emitted from the dispersive electrode cord has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether, and to what extent, the dispersive electrode cord contributes to unintentional energy transfer and describe practical steps to minimize risk. METHODS: In a laparoscopic simulator, a monopolar generator delivered radiofrequency energy to an L-hook. Thermal imaging quantified the change in tissue temperature nearest to the tip of a non-electrical instrument following activation. The orientation of the dispersive electrode cord was varied relative to other instruments. RESULTS: When the dispersive electrode cord is parallel to the camera cord, tissue temperature increased at the telescope tip by 46 ± 6 °C from baseline (p < 0.001). Similar heat was generated when the camera cord was oriented parallel to the active electrode cord (46 ± 6 vs. 48 ± 7 °C, respectively, p = 0.48). Adding a second dispersive electrode decreased the temperature change (46 ± 6 vs. 25 ± 9 °C, p < 0.001). Temperature increase was greater with coagulation versus cut mode (33 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 6 °C, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stray energy emitted from the dispersive electrode cord heats tissue >40 °C via antenna coupling; the same magnitude as the active electrode cord. Practical steps to minimize stray energy transfer include avoiding orienting the dispersive electrode cord in parallel with other cords, adding a second dispersive electrode, and using low-voltage cut mode.
BACKGROUND: The monopolar instrument emits stray radiofrequency energy from its cord when activated. This is a source of unintended thermal injury to patients. Stray energy emitted from the dispersive electrode cord has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine whether, and to what extent, the dispersive electrode cord contributes to unintentional energy transfer and describe practical steps to minimize risk. METHODS: In a laparoscopic simulator, a monopolar generator delivered radiofrequency energy to an L-hook. Thermal imaging quantified the change in tissue temperature nearest to the tip of a non-electrical instrument following activation. The orientation of the dispersive electrode cord was varied relative to other instruments. RESULTS: When the dispersive electrode cord is parallel to the camera cord, tissue temperature increased at the telescope tip by 46 ± 6 °C from baseline (p < 0.001). Similar heat was generated when the camera cord was oriented parallel to the active electrode cord (46 ± 6 vs. 48 ± 7 °C, respectively, p = 0.48). Adding a second dispersive electrode decreased the temperature change (46 ± 6 vs. 25 ± 9 °C, p < 0.001). Temperature increase was greater with coagulation versus cut mode (33 ± 7 vs. 22 ± 6 °C, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Stray energy emitted from the dispersive electrode cord heats tissue >40 °C via antenna coupling; the same magnitude as the active electrode cord. Practical steps to minimize stray energy transfer include avoiding orienting the dispersive electrode cord in parallel with other cords, adding a second dispersive electrode, and using low-voltage cut mode.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antenna coupling; Dispersive electrode; Electrosurgery; Monopolar; Radiofrequency; Stray energy
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Katherine R Pavlovsky; Heidi Looney; Greg V Stiegmann; Francis T McGreevy Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 1.719
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Kelli S Barnes; Henry R Govekar; Greg V Stiegmann; Christina L Dunn; Francis T McGreevy Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: P Fuchshuber; S Schwaitzberg; D Jones; S B Jones; L Feldman; M Munro; T Robinson; G Purcell-Jackson; D Mikami; A Madani; M Brunt; B Dunkin; C Gugliemi; L Groah; R Lim; J Mischna; C R Voyles Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Douglas M Overbey; Heather Carmichael; Krzysztof J Wikiel; Douglas A Hirth; Brandon C Chapman; John T Moore; Carlton C Barnett; Teresa S Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Edward L Jones Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 4.584