Literature DB >> 21594739

Residual heat of laparoscopic energy devices: how long must the surgeon wait to touch additional tissue?

Henry R Govekar1, Thomas N Robinson, Greg V Stiegmann, Francis T McGreevy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Energy devices are essential laparoscopic tools. Residual heat is defined as the increased instrument temperature after energy activation is completed. This study aimed to determine the length of time a surgeon needs to wait before touching other tissue using four common laparoscopic energy sources.
METHODS: Thermal imaging quantified instrument and tissue temperature ex vivo using monopolar coagulation, argon beam coagulation, ultrasonic dissection, and bipolar tissue fusion devices. To simulate realistic operative usage, each instrument was activated for 5 s four consecutive times with 5 s pauses between fires. Thermal conductivity to bovine liver tissue was measured 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 s after final activation.
RESULTS: The maximum increase in instrument tip temperature was 172 ± 63°C for the ultrasonic dissection, 81 ± 18°C for the monopolar coagulation, 46 ± 19°C for the bipolar tissue fusion, and 1 ± 1°C for the argon beam coagulation (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Touching the instrument tip to tissue at four intervals after the final activation (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 s) found that ultrasonic energy raised the tissue temperature higher (maximum change, 58°C) than the other three energy devices at all four time points (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic energy instruments have greater residual heat than monopolar electrosurgery, bipolar tissue fusion, and argon beam. The ultrasonic energy instrument tips heated tissue more than 20°C from baseline even 20 s after activation; whereas all the other energy sources raised the tissue temperature less than 20°C by 5 s. These practical findings may alter a surgeon's usage of these common energy devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21594739     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1742-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

Review 1.  Complications and recommended practices for electrosurgery in laparoscopy.

Authors:  M P Wu; C S Ou; S L Chen; E Y Yen; R Rowbotham
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Authors:  Tarek A Emam; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The ultrasonic coagulating and cutting system injures nerve function.

Authors:  T Owaki; S Nakano; K Arimura; T Aikou
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Surgeon-controlled factors that reduce monopolar electrosurgery capacitive coupling during laparoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas N Robinson; Katherine R Pavlovsky; Heidi Looney; Greg V Stiegmann; Francis T McGreevy
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.

Authors:  Theodore Diamantis; Michael Kontos; Antonios Arvelakis; Spiridon Syroukis; Dimitris Koronarchis; Apostolos Papalois; Emmanuel Agapitos; Elias Bastounis; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Temperature safety profile of laparoscopic devices: Harmonic ACE (ACE), Ligasure V (LV), and plasma trisector (PT).

Authors:  F J Kim; M F Chammas; E Gewehr; M Morihisa; F Caldas; E Hayacibara; M Baptistussi; F Meyer; A C Martins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Dissection techniques in laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  S M Shimi
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1995-08

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists' 1995 membership survey.

Authors:  J F Hulka; B S Levy; W H Parker; J M Phillips
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1997-02

9.  Experimental nerve thermal injury.

Authors:  D Xu; M Pollock
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy.

Authors:  C C Nduka; P A Super; J R Monson; A W Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  10 in total

1.  Radiofrequency energy antenna coupling to common laparoscopic instruments: practical implications.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Jennifer R McHenry; Christina L Dunn; Paul N Montero; Henry R Govekar; Greg V Stiegmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Unintended stray energy from monopolar instruments: beware the dispersive electrode cord.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Nicole A Nadlonek; Edward L Jones; Jennifer R McHenry; Bruce Dunne; Gregory V Stiegmann; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Stray energy transfer in single-incision robotic surgery.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Wikiel; Douglas M Overbey; Heather Carmichael; Brandon C Chapman; John T Moore; Carlton C Barnett; Teresa S Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Edward L Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery increases the risk of unintentional thermal injury from the monopolar "Bovie" instrument in comparison with traditional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Nicole T Townsend; Edward L Jones; Doug Overbey; Bruce Dunne; Jennifer McHenry; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose.

Authors:  P Fuchshuber; S Schwaitzberg; D Jones; S B Jones; L Feldman; M Munro; T Robinson; G Purcell-Jackson; D Mikami; A Madani; M Brunt; B Dunkin; C Gugliemi; L Groah; R Lim; J Mischna; C R Voyles
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Functional long-term results after rectal cancer surgery--technique of the athermal mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Aristotelis Touloumtzidis; Björn Sostmann; Nicole Hilgers; Marc A Renter; Petra Kühn; Peter E Goretzki; Bernhard J Lammers
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Non-vascular experimental and clinical applications of advanced bipolar radiofrequency thermofusion technology in the thorax and abdomen: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shobhit Arya; Hugh Mackenzie; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intestinal Injury by Heat Conduction from Surgical Sealing Devices.

Authors:  Toshiro Suzuki; Ryouhei Hattori; Tomonori Minagawa; Takeshi Uehara; Teruyuki Ogawa; Osamu Ishizuka
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Temperature profile and residual heat of monopolar laparoscopic and endoscopic dissection instruments.

Authors:  Alexander Hendricks; Frank Schwandner; Franz Brinkmann; Ronny Hüttner; Philipp J Mehner; Konrad Henkel; Georgi Paschew; Moritz Herzog; Nora Martens; Andreas Richter; Sebastian Hinz; Justus Groß; Clemens Schafmayer; Jochen Hampe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 10.  Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Brij Madhok; Kushan Nanayakkara; Kamal Mahawar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-01-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.