Literature DB >> 11058851

A randomized prospective study of radially expanding trocars in laparoscopic surgery.

S Bhoyrul1, J Payne, B Steffes, L Swanstrom, L W Way.   

Abstract

Trocar injury is one of the most serious and potentially preventable complications of laparoscopic surgery. Use of a blunt rather than a cutting trocar could be expected to lessen the likelihood of this injury. Therefore complications related to laparoscopic port design were studied by comparing conventional cutting trocars with radially expanding (blunt) trocars. A multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 250 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures at tertiary care centers and community hospitals. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group C, conventional cutting trocars; or group S, radially expanding trocars. Sixteen surgeons performed 244 elective laparoscopic procedures; six patients were removed from the study. One hundred nineteen patients were assigned to group S and 125 to group C. The groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and type of procedure. The following data were collected: intraoperative complications related to the trocars, abdominal wall bleeding, visceral or vascular injury, other complications, fascial closure, procedure time, trocar site assessment at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively, and visual analog pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Fascial defects from 10 mm or larger trocars in group C were closed; the fascial defects in group S were not closed. The trocar sites were checked for incisional hernias at late follow-up. Mean operating time was not different between the two groups (group S, 92 +/- 73 minutes; group C, 100 +/- 74 minutes). There were no episodes of intraoperative cannula site bleeding in group S compared with 16 episodes in 13 patients (P < 0.001) in group C. Postoperative wound complications were fewer in group S (13 vs. 23; P < 0.05). Although the pain scores were generally lower in group S, the differences were not significant. Only 3% of the patients in group S had fascial defects of 10 mm or greater that had to be closed. Within a follow-up period of 6 to 18 months, there have been no incisional hernias in either group. This study shows that radially expanding trocars are safe and effective, and less likely than conventional trocars to result in intraoperative or postoperative complications. The defects created by the radially expanding trocars do not have to be routinely closed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11058851     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80018-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  11 in total

1.  Bowel injury litigation after laparoscopy.

Authors:  R M Soderstrom
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1993-11

2.  Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan.

Authors:  M Hashizume; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A new, radially expanding access system for laparoscopic procedures versus conventional cannulas.

Authors:  D J Turner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1996-08

4.  A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications.

Authors:  P Härkki-Sirén; T Kurki
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Radially expanding dilatation. A superior method of laparoscopic trocar access.

Authors:  S Bhoyrul; T Mori; L W Way
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Radial Expanding Cannula and the Conventional Cannula with Sleeve for Operative Laparoscopy

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1996-08

7.  A randomized comparison of Verres needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy.

Authors:  J W Byron; G Markenson; K Miyazawa
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-09

8.  Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI).

Authors:  L E Saville; M S Woods
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Major vascular injury as a complication of laparoscopic surgery: a report of three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Geers; C Holden
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  Randomized trial comparing a radially expandable needle system with cutting trocars.

Authors:  J R Feste; B Bojahr; D J Turner
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  30 in total

1.  Incidence of acute postoperative robotic port-site hernias: results from a high-volume multispecialty center.

Authors:  Tanuja Damani; Les James; Jason C Fisher; Paresh C Shah
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-07-24

Review 2.  A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H Kehlet; A W Gray; F Bonnet; F Camu; H B J Fischer; R F McCloy; E A M Neugebauer; M M Puig; N Rawal; C J P Simanski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Safe and rapid laparoscopic access--a new approach.

Authors:  Jared L Antevil; Sunil Bhoyrul; Mathew E Brunson; Mark A Vierra; Nayan D Swadia
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Trocar-related abdominal wall bleeding in 200 patients after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: Personal experience.

Authors:  Girolamo Geraci; Carmelo Sciume; Franco Pisello; Francesco Li Volsi; Tiziana Facella; Giuseppe Modica
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A rare case of interparietal incisional hernia from 8 mm trocar site after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  S K Lim; K H Kim; T-Y Shin; S J Hong; Y D Choi; K H Rha
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Port Site Herniation of the Small Bowel following Laparoscopic-Myomectomy: A case report.

Authors:  Ghazi A Elshafie; Khalifa Al-Wahaibi; Ahmed Al-Azri; Hani Al-Qadhi; Abdullah Al-Harthi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-04-17

7.  Primary access-related complications with laparoscopy: comparison of blind and open techniques.

Authors:  A-C Moberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Optimizing working space in porcine laparoscopy: CT measurement of the effects of intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  John Vlot; Rene Wijnen; Robert Jan Stolker; Klaas Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Blunt versus bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.