Literature DB >> 8955415

Analysis of the region between amino acids 30 and 42 of intact UmuD by a monocysteine approach.

A Guzzo1, M H Lee, K Oda, G C Walker.   

Abstract

On the basis of characterizations of a set of UmuD monocysteine derivatives, we had suggested that positions 24, 34, and 44 are closer to the intact UmuD homodimer interface than other positions tested (M. H. Lee, T. Ohta, and G. C. Walker, J. Bacteriol. 176:4825-4837, 1994). Because this region of UmuD also appeared to be important for interactions with RecA, we followed up on our previous study by constructing a second set of monocysteine UmuD derivatives with single cysteine substitutions at positions 30 to 42. We found that like the VC34 mutant, UmuD derivatives with monocysteine substitutions at positions 32 and 35 showed deficiencies in in vivo and in vitro RecA-mediated cleavage as well as in UV mutagenesis, suggesting that the position 32 to 35 region may be important for RecA-mediated cleavage of UmuD. Interestingly, UmuD with monocysteine substitutions at residues 33 and 40 showed a reduction in UV mutagenesis while retaining the ability to be cleaved by RecA in vivo, suggesting a deficiency in the subsequent role of the UmuD' derivatives in mutagenesis. All of the UmuD monocysteine derivatives in the position 30 to 42 series purified indistinguishably from the wild-type protein. The observations that purified proteins of the UmuD derivatives RC37 and IC38 could be disulfide cross-linked quantitatively upon addition of iodine and yet were poorly modified with iodoacetate led us to suggest that the pairs of residues at positions 37 and 38 are extremely close to the UmuD2 homodimer interface. These observations indicate that the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer in solution is very different from the crystal structure of the UmuD'2 homodimer reported by Peat et al. (T. S. Peat, E. G. Frank, J. P. McDonald, A. S. Levine, R. Woodgate, and W. A. Hendrickson, Nature [London] 380:727-730, 1996).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8955415      PMCID: PMC178646          DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7295-7303.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  34 in total

1.  RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation.

Authors:  T Nohmi; J R Battista; L A Dodson; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The appearance of the UmuD'C protein complex in Escherichia coli switches repair from homologous recombination to SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  S Sommer; A Bailone; R Devoret
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Structure of a bacterial sensory receptor. A site-directed sulfhydryl study.

Authors:  J J Falke; A F Dernburg; D A Sternberg; N Zalkin; D L Milligan; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives.

Authors:  M H Lee; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA.

Authors:  S E Burckhardt; R Woodgate; R H Scheuermann; H Echols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A monocysteine approach for probing the structure and interactions of the UmuD protein.

Authors:  M H Lee; T Ohta; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Interactions between epsilon, the proofreading subunit of DNA polymerase III, and proteins involved in the SOS response of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P L Foster; A D Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1988-11

8.  Isolation and characterization of noncleavable (Ind-) mutants of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  L L Lin; J W Little
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  H Shinagawa; H Iwasaki; T Kato; A Nakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structure of the UmuD' protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  T S Peat; E G Frank; J P McDonald; A S Levine; R Woodgate; W A Hendrickson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  T Opperman; S Murli; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Posttranslational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the beta processivity clamp.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Issay Narumi; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Lon-mediated proteolysis of the Escherichia coli UmuD mutagenesis protein: in vitro degradation and identification of residues required for proteolysis.

Authors:  M Gonzalez; E G Frank; A S Levine; R Woodgate
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Skiing the black diamond slope: progress on the biochemistry of translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mutations affecting the ability of the Escherichia coli UmuD' protein to participate in SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  T Ohta; M D Sutton; A Guzzo; S Cole; A E Ferentz; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase manager proteins UmuD and UmuD'.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Kasper D Rand; Michelle C Silva; Thomas E Wales; John R Engen; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  A role for the umuDC gene products of Escherichia coli in increasing resistance to DNA damage in stationary phase by inhibiting the transition to exponential growth.

Authors:  S Murli; T Opperman; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response.

Authors:  B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The response of Escherichia coli to the alkylating agents chloroacetaldehyde and styrene oxide.

Authors:  Mark M Muenter; Ariel Aiken; Jadesola O Akanji; Samir Baig; Sirine Bellou; Alyssa Carlson; Charles Conway; Courtney M Cowell; Nicholas A DeLateur; Alexis Hester; Christopher Joshi; Caitlin Kramer; Becky S Leifer; Emma Nash; Macee H Qi; Meghan Travers; Kelly C Wong; Man Hu; Na Gou; Roger W Giese; April Z Gu; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.873

10.  Novel Escherichia coli umuD' mutants: structure-function insights into SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  M McLenigan; T S Peat; E G Frank; J P McDonald; M Gonzalez; A S Levine; W A Hendrickson; R Woodgate
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.