Literature DB >> 8955414

Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives.

M H Lee1, G C Walker.   

Abstract

SOS mutagenesis in Escherichia coli requires the participation of a specialized system involving the activated form of UmuD (UmuD'), UmuC, RecA, and DNA polymerase III proteins. We have used a set of monocysteine derivatives of UmuD (M. H. Lee, T. Ohta, and G. C. Walker, J. Bacteriol. 176:4825-4837, 1994) and the cysteine-specific photoactive cross-linker p-azidoiodoacetanilide (AIA) to study not only the interactions of intact UmuD in the homodimer but also the interactions of UmuD with activated RecA. The reactivities of the individual UmuD monocysteine derivatives with AIA were similar to their reactivities with iodoacetate. The relative efficiencies of cross-linking of the AIA-modified monocysteine UmuD derivatives in the homodimer form are also consistent with our previous conclusions concerning the relative closeness of various UmuD residues to the dimer interface. With respect to the UmuD-RecA interface, the AIA-modified VC34 and SC81 monocysteine derivatives cross-linked most efficiently with RecA, indicating that positions 34 and 81 of UmuD are closer to the RecA interface than the other positions we tested. The AIA-modified SC57, SC67, and SC112 monocysteine derivatives cross-linked moderately efficiently with RecA. Neither C24, the wild-type UmuD that has a cysteine located at the Cys-24-Gly-25 cleavage site, nor SC60, the UmuD monocysteine derivative with a cysteine substitution at the position of the putative active-site residue, was able to cross-link with RecA, suggesting that RecA need not directly interact with residues involved in the cleavage reaction. SC19, located in the N-terminal fragment of UmuD that is cleaved, and LC44 also did not cross-link efficiently with RecA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8955414      PMCID: PMC178645          DOI: 10.1128/jb.178.24.7285-7294.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  31 in total

1.  Lambda repressor inactivation: properties of purified ind- proteins in the autodigestion and RecA-mediated cleavage reactions.

Authors:  F S Gimble; R T Sauer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1986-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Homology among DNA-binding proteins suggests use of a conserved super-secondary structure.

Authors:  R T Sauer; R R Yocum; R F Doolittle; M Lewis; C O Pabo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  umuDC and mucAB operons whose products are required for UV light- and chemical-induced mutagenesis: UmuD, MucA, and LexA proteins share homology.

Authors:  K L Perry; S J Elledge; B B Mitchell; L Marsh; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Lysine-156 and serine-119 are required for LexA repressor cleavage: a possible mechanism.

Authors:  S N Slilaty; J W Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors.

Authors:  J W Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA.

Authors:  S E Burckhardt; R Woodgate; R H Scheuermann; H Echols
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease.

Authors:  J W Little; S H Edmiston; L Z Pacelli; D W Mount
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  H Shinagawa; H Iwasaki; T Kato; A Nakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Structure of the UmuD' protein and its regulation in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  T S Peat; E G Frank; J P McDonald; A S Levine; R Woodgate; W A Hendrickson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Intramolecular cleavage of LexA and phage lambda repressors: dependence of kinetics on repressor concentration, pH, temperature, and solvent.

Authors:  S N Slilaty; J A Rupley; J W Little
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  16 in total

1.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  T Opperman; S Murli; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Physical interactions between DinI and RecA nucleoprotein filament for the regulation of SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  T Yasuda; K Morimatsu; R Kato; J Usukura; M Takahashi; H Ohmori
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Posttranslational modification of the umuD-encoded subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V regulates its interactions with the beta processivity clamp.

Authors:  Mark D Sutton; Issay Narumi; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Converting a DNA damage checkpoint effector (UmuD2C) into a lesion bypass polymerase (UmuD'2C).

Authors:  A E Ferentz; G C Walker; G Wagner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  UmuD and RecA directly modulate the mutagenic potential of the Y family DNA polymerase DinB.

Authors:  Veronica G Godoy; Daniel F Jarosz; Sharotka M Simon; Alexej Abyzov; Valentin Ilyin; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Skiing the black diamond slope: progress on the biochemistry of translesion DNA synthesis.

Authors:  G C Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli DNA polymerase manager proteins UmuD and UmuD'.

Authors:  Jing Fang; Kasper D Rand; Michelle C Silva; Thomas E Wales; John R Engen; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Analysis of the region between amino acids 30 and 42 of intact UmuD by a monocysteine approach.

Authors:  A Guzzo; M H Lee; K Oda; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  A role for the umuDC gene products of Escherichia coli in increasing resistance to DNA damage in stationary phase by inhibiting the transition to exponential growth.

Authors:  S Murli; T Opperman; B T Smith; G C Walker
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The Roles of UmuD in Regulating Mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jaylene N Ollivierre; Jing Fang; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.