Literature DB >> 8943636

Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

A M Phillips1, N J Goddard, J E Tomlinson.   

Abstract

A postal questionnaire was sent to all Fellows of the British Orthopaedic Association to obtain a census of total knee replacement (TKR) preferences in the United Kingdom; 1162 questionnaires were sent and 721 replies received. There were 92 Fellows who had retired or filled in the forms incorrectly, and 32 no longer perform TKR. Thus, 597 responded correctly, giving a 62% response rate. This gives an extrapolated total of 34,677 TKRs being implanted per year in the UK, with an average of 34.3 being performed by each surgeon per year. Only 9% perform more than 90 per year. There were 41 different prostheses in current use among the respondents to our questionnaire, of which five prostheses constituted 61% of the total. Cemented prostheses were used by 95.2%. Resurfacing of the patella was always carried out by 32%, while 19% never resurface it; the most common reason for doing so being patellofemoral arthropathy at operation. Intramedullary alignment was used for the femoral component in 86%, 76% preferred extramedullary alignment for the tibial component. Regarding cementing technique, 43% use pulsatile lavage, 9% used a cement gun, 88% dry the bone and 56% seal the hole made by the femoral alignment device in the femur before cementing. All components were cemented simultaneously by 65% and one at a time by 31%. Metal-backed tibial prostheses are now used by 98% of surgeons, modular tibial components being preferred by 80%. Metal-backed patellar components were used by 13%. An onlay type of patella was preferred by 51%. This survey highlights the great diversity of surgical practice in the UK, which may reflect uncertainty regarding best practice in total knee replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8943636      PMCID: PMC2502847     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  24 in total

1.  The use of metal-backed patellar prostheses in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Laskin; A Bucknell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Mechanisms of failure of the femoral and tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E Windsor; G R Scuderi; M C Moran; J N Insall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Technique for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  L Marmor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Freeman-Samuelson total arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  M A Freeman; K M Samuelson; K C Bertin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Long-term results of cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K G Vince; J N Insall
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Patellar instability after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J N Grace; J A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery.

Authors:  A Hashemi-Nejad; N C Birch; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Failure mechanisms of metal-backed patellar components.

Authors:  S D Stulberg; B N Stulberg; Y Hamati; A Tsao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with inflammatory arthritis and compromised bone.

Authors:  S A Stuchin; M Ruoff; W Matarese
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  15 in total

1.  How long should patients be followed-up after total hip replacement? Current practice in the UK.

Authors:  M J Bankes; R Coull; B D Ferris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  How to read a postoperative knee replacement radiograph.

Authors:  Nawfal Al-Hadithy; Madhavan C Papanna; Sana Farooq; Yegappan Kalairajah
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

Authors:  T D Tennent; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Predicting anterior cruciate ligament integrity in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Alex J Trompeter; K Gill; M A C Appleton; S H Palmer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The effect of application time of two types of bone cement on the cement-bone interface strength.

Authors:  Ziad Dahabreh; Hannah Kalpana Phillips; Todd Stewart; Martin Stone
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-06

7.  A dutch survey on circumpatellar electrocautery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Alexander F W Barnaart; Cees C P M Verheyen
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-06-22

8.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment of the tibial component in the Triathlon knee.

Authors:  James P Cashman; Fiona L Carty; Keith Synnott; Paddy J Kenny
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Does a simple syringe applicator enhance bone cement set up time in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Sarah E Dalton; Anton Khlopas; Assem A Sultan; Gannon L Curtis; Matthew A Harb; Qais Naziri; Jared M Newman; John W Barrington; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

10.  Knee arthroplasty with hardware removal: complication cascade. Is it preventable?

Authors:  Gabriel Nierenberg; Alaa Abu Elasal; Eran Keltz; Doron Norman
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.