Literature DB >> 10700765

Current attitudes to total hip replacement in the younger patient: results of a national survey.

T D Tennent1, N J Goddard.   

Abstract

A postal questionnaire was sent to all practicing consultant orthopaedic surgeons in the UK seeking information regarding their usual total hip replacement practice, the age at which they would define a patient as falling into the 'young hip group' and whether this might modify their practice. In particular, in the 'younger' age group, we were interested in the frequency of usage of uncemented implants, the choice of implant and the bearing surfaces. Of 1242 surgeons surveyed, we had a response from 935 who currently undertake total hip arthroplasty. Their responses confirm that approximately 60,645 total hip replacements are performed annually in the UK of which 9,376 are performed in the younger age group (mean age 57.5 years). As with our previous survey, the most popular prosthesis in the 'older' age group overall was the Charnley (51%) followed by the Exeter (15%). These implants also proved to be the most popular in the 'younger' age group (40% Charnley, 18% Exeter), with 75% of surgeons choosing a cemented stem, and 65% also opting to cement the socket. 23% of surgeons used hydroxy-apatite coated implants on both the femoral and acetabular sides of the joint. Stainless steel remained the most popular choice of femoral head bearing surface (42%) followed by chrome-cobalt (33%) and ceramic (25%). On the acetabular side, high density polyethylene predominated--accounting for 95%, with only 3% using chrome cobalt and 2% ceramic. There would appear to be a remarkably conservative attitude among British surgeons, the majority of whom prefer to stick with tried and tested cemented femoral implants when dealing with the younger patient. There are a small number of uncemented acetabulae and the hybrid configuration. Hydroxy-apatite coatings seem to be the most popular choice for the non-cemented prostheses. Ceramic femoral heads are used more frequently than the ceramic acetabular bearing, and equally metal/metal bearings remain infrequently used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10700765      PMCID: PMC2503446     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  25 in total

1.  Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1961-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Poss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements.

Authors:  A R Britton; D W Murray; C J Bulstrode; K McPherson; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-09

4.  Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

Authors:  A M Phillips; N J Goddard; J E Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Stanmore total hip replacement in younger patients: review of a group of patients under 50 years of age at operation.

Authors:  D F Emery; H J Clarke; M L Grover
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

6.  Middle-term results of threaded acetabular cups. High failure rates five years after surgery.

Authors:  H G Simank; D R Brocai; D Reiser; M Thomsen; D Sabo; M Lukoschek
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-05

7.  Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.

Authors:  R L Barrack; R D Mulroy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

8.  The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1972-02

9.  Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. Clinical and radiographic results after five to eight years of follow-up.

Authors:  W N Capello; J A D'Antonio; J R Feinberg; M T Manley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery.

Authors:  A Hashemi-Nejad; N C Birch; N J Goddard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  6 in total

1.  Are national guidelines for total hip replacement in the UK reflected in practice?

Authors:  A Abraham; L Hajipour; A R Innes; H Phillips; A W McCaskie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  The effect of total hip replacement on employment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Chongru He; Xiaokang He; Wenwen Tong; Wei Zheng; Tianfang Zhang; Jinzhu Zhao; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Socio-economic impact of Birmingham hip resurfacing on patient employment after ten years.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Malek; Munawar Hashmi; James P Holland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The effect of total hip replacement on the employment status of patients under the age of 60 years.

Authors:  R Mobasheri; S Gidwani; J W Rosson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Outcomes of birmingham hip resurfacing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steve Karas
Journal:  Asian J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03

Review 6.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.