Literature DB >> 9326124

Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

R Y Liow1, D W Murray.   

Abstract

Comparative information on total knee replacements (TKRs) is not readily available. With the help of implant manufacturers and distributors, we have compiled a list of TKRs on the market in the UK and summarised the information about these implants in a table. There are 37 different TKRs, marketed by 14 companies; 54% have been introduced since 1990. The number of different implants is increasing. At least eight designs have undergone major modifications, while many have had minor alterations. Of the TKRs on the market, 60% are modular. Some 54% of TKRs have no published results in peer-reviewed journals; only one of the four most widely used prostheses has published survival figures. New and modified implants are introduced without clinical evidence of their superiority over other available designs. Published results in peer-reviewed journals are currently the best evidence available on the reliability of an implant. When selecting an implant, surgeons should be aware if the prosthesis has any such results, the length of the follow-up, and the survival rates that are achieved. More detailed interpretation is difficult because of the different combinations used in modular implants and because of the frequent modification of existing designs. Properly conducted long-term clinical trials should be encouraged as they are the only means of evaluating new designs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9326124      PMCID: PMC2503060     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

1.  Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years.

Authors:  S H Stern; J N Insall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Knee prostheses--one step forward, two steps back.

Authors:  J Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-01

4.  Are unconstrained components essential in total knee arthroplasty? Long-term results of the Blauth knee prosthesis.

Authors:  W Blauth; J Hassenpflug
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Survivorship of cemented knee replacements.

Authors:  G R Scuderi; J N Insall; R E Windsor; M C Moran
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11

6.  The Minns meniscal knee prosthesis: biomechanical aspects of the surgical procedure and a review of the first 165 cases.

Authors:  R J Minns
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Two- to four-year results of posterior cruciate-sparing condylar total knee arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component.

Authors:  R J Wright; J Lima; R D Scott; T S Thornhill
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. Results after five to nine years: a follow-up note.

Authors:  J Wright; F C Ewald; P S Walker; W H Thomas; R Poss; C B Sledge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  R D Scott; R F Santore
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; W F Flynn; S Saddler; K K Hansraj; M J Maynard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Which primary shoulder and elbow replacement? A review of the results of prostheses available in the UK.

Authors:  D C Mackay; B Hudson; J R Williams
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty--a surgeon's first 99 replacements.

Authors:  Alasdair J A Santini; Videsh Raut
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Constraints in posterior-stabilised TKA kinematics: a comparison of two generations of an implant.

Authors:  Hemant Pandit; Bernard Hendrik van Duren; M Price; S Tilley; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Neil P Thomas; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  RSA prediction of high failure rate for the uncoated Interax TKA confirmed by meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jan W Schoones; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 5.  Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.

Authors:  Paul van der Voort; Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jorrit Jasper; Marta Fiocco; Josepha W M Plevier; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  CMM-Based Volumetric Assessment Methodology for Polyethylene Tibial Knee Inserts in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Cuicui Ji; Zhongmin Jin; Yuntian Dai
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 7.  Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Marta Fiocco; Josepha Wm Plevier; Saskia Middeldorp; Rob Ghh Nelissen; Edward R Valstar
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.