Literature DB >> 29299472

Does a simple syringe applicator enhance bone cement set up time in knee arthroplasty?

Nipun Sodhi1, Sarah E Dalton2, Anton Khlopas1, Assem A Sultan1, Gannon L Curtis1, Matthew A Harb3, Qais Naziri3, Jared M Newman3, John W Barrington4, Michael A Mont1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The time required for polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement curing or hardening can be modified by a number of variables including the mixing technique, and the temperature and pressure at which the process is taking place. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate two different methods of PMMA application in terms of set up time. Specifically, we (I) compared the PMMA set up time of cement that remained in the mixing bowl to cement that was placed in a syringe and (II) extrapolated the associated annual cost difference on the national and individual surgeon levels.
METHODS: The cement set up time was measured for a total of 146 consecutive patients who underwent either unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (n=136) or patellofemoral arthroplasty (n=10) between January 2016 and April 2017. One pack of PMMA powder and monomer were mixed, placed in a 300 mL small plastic bowl, and mixed with a tongue depressor. Then, 50 mL of the mixed PMMA was placed in a sterile 60 mL syringe with the tip cut to a 6-mm opening, and the syringe was used to apply the cement to the bone and the prosthesis surface. The remaining unused cement in the syringe (syringe group) and the remaining unused cement in the plastic bowl (bowl group) were removed and formed into a two separate 2 cm diameter cubes that were allowed to cure at room temperature on a sterile set of osteotomes. The two cubes of cement were timed for complete PMMA curing. A two-tailed student's t-test was used to compare the curing time for the two groups. Annual cost differences were calculated on the national and individual surgeon level. The total number of daily cases performed and the operative time savings using the syringe applicator was used to find daily and annual cost savings.
RESULTS: The mean time for the cement to set up in the bowl group was 16.8±2.1 minutes, and the mean time for cement set up in the syringe group was 15.1±1.7 minutes. Compared to the bowl group cement set up time, the syringe group set up time was significantly lower (P<0.0001). An estimated 350,000 cemented knee arthroplasties are performed each year in the United States. With 1.7 minutes saved per case, 595,000 operating room minutes per year could be saved, resulting in a nearly $71,000,000 national and $110,000 individual surgeon annual cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study demonstrated that the utilization of a simple, inexpensive syringe applicator enhanced the cement set up time by over one and a half minutes. This may be a result of the pressure differences in the syringe applicator. In addition to the control of and precision of where the cement is placed, the syringe applicator could provide an important potential time advantage to the arthroplasty surgeon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement; knee arthroplasty; set up time

Year:  2017        PMID: 29299472      PMCID: PMC5750254          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.11.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  22 in total

1.  [Comparative study of fixation mode in total knee arthroplasty with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  P Gicquel; J F Kempf; F Gastaud; B Schlemmer; F Bonnomet
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-05

2.  Survey of current cementing techniques in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael John Lutz; Brett Richard Halliday
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  What does one minute of operating room time cost?

Authors:  Alex Macario
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adolph V Lombardi; Carl C Berasi; Keith R Berend
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

Authors:  A M Phillips; N J Goddard; J E Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Mortality, cost, and health outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in Medicare patients.

Authors:  Scott T Lovald; Kevin L Ong; Edmund C Lau; Jordana K Schmier; Kevin J Bozic; Steve M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Can cementing technique reduce the cost of a primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Aditya V Maheshwari; Mayank Argawal; Qais Naziri; Robert Pivec; Michael A Mont; Vijay J Rasquinha
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 8.  Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Aditya Maheshwari; Steven F Harwin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  S Smith; V S Naima; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Peersman; R Laskin; J Davis; M G E Peterson; T Richart
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.