Literature DB >> 25192848

The effect of application time of two types of bone cement on the cement-bone interface strength.

Ziad Dahabreh1, Hannah Kalpana Phillips, Todd Stewart, Martin Stone.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the application time of bone cement would have an effect on the cement-bone interface strength in two types of commercially available bone cements. CMW1 Radiopaque(®) (CMW1) and SmartSetHV(®) (SmartSet) were applied to bovine cancellous bone specimens at 2 and at 4 min. Specimens were loaded to failure and the shear strength of the cement-bone interface was calculated. The mean shear strength (±standard deviation) of the cement-bone interface was 2.79 ± 1.29 MPa for CMW1 applied at 2 min; 1.35 ± 0.89 MPa for CMW1 applied at 4 min; 2.93 ± 1.21 MPa for SmartSet applied at 2 min and 3.00 ± 1.11 MPa for SmartSet applied at 4 min. Compared to all other groups, the cement-bone interface strength was significantly lower when CMW1 was applied to the bone specimens at 4 min (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the cement-bone interface strength when SmartSet was applied to bone at 2 and at 4 min. Under these testing conditions, the cement-bone interface strength was not affected by the time of application of SmartSet to bone. However, it was significantly lower when CMW1 was applied to bone at 4 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25192848     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1522-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

1.  Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.

Authors:  K A Mann; F W Werner; D C Ayers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Survey of current cementing techniques in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael John Lutz; Brett Richard Halliday
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Influence of delayed injection time on the creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  T L Norman; M Williams; T A Gruen; J D Blaha
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-11

4.  Current techniques in total knee replacement: results of a national survey.

Authors:  A M Phillips; N J Goddard; J E Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Mechanical and morphologic investigation of the tensile strength of a bone-hydroxyapatite interface.

Authors:  J T Edwards; J B Brunski; H W Higuchi
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-09-15

6.  The influence of cementing technique and blood on the strength of the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  G C Bannister; A W Miles
Journal:  Eng Med       Date:  1988-07

7.  Local stresses and bone adaption around orthopedic implants.

Authors:  R Huiskes; D Nunamaker
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Long-term compressive creep deformation and damage in acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  D J Chwirut
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1984-01

9.  Strength of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  W R Krause; W Krug; J Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  K A Mann; R Mocarski; L A Damron; M J Allen; D C Ayers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.