Literature DB >> 8935894

Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.

P A Breslin1, G K Beauchamp, E N Pugh.   

Abstract

We investigated the ability of subjects to discriminate sugars with a whole-mouth forced-choice paradigm, in which a standard solution was compared with a test solution of varied concentration. Discrimination probabilities were U-shaped functions of test concentration: for 6 subjects and pairwise combinations of fructose, glucose, and sucrose, discriminability always declined to chance over a narrow range of test concentrations. At concentrations < or = 100 mM, maltose was indiscriminable from fructose but discriminable at higher concentrations for 4 subjects. By analogy with the monochromacy of night vision, whereby any two lights are indiscriminable when their relative intensities are suitably adjusted, we call the gustatory indiscriminability of these sugars monogeusia. The simplest account of monogeusia is that all information about the indiscriminable sugars is represented by a single neural signal that varies only in magnitude. The discriminability of maltose from the other sugars at higher concentrations is consistent with the hypothesis that maltose also activates a second gustatory code.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935894     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  7 in total

1.  Monochromatism determined at a long-wavelength/middle-wavelength cone-antagonistic locus.

Authors:  D J Calkins; J E Thornton; E N Pugh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  The pi mechanisms of W S Stiles: an historical review.

Authors:  E N Pugh; D B Kirk
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Single sweetness signal.

Authors:  P A Breslin; S Kemp; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Studies on the perception of taste: do primaries exist?

Authors:  R P Erickson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-01

5.  Extrageniculate vision in hemianopic humans: saccade inhibition by signals in the blind field.

Authors:  R Rafal; J Smith; J Krantz; A Cohen; C Brennan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Multiple receptor sites mediate sweetness: evidence from cross adaptation.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; H Cahn; M G Lindley
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.533

  7 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 2.  Is there a fatty acid taste?

Authors:  Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

4.  Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Stacy L Kopka
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Salivary Amylase: Digestion and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Catherine Peyrot des Gachons; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Lindsey A Schier
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  High endogenous salivary amylase activity is associated with improved glycemic homeostasis following starch ingestion in adults.

Authors:  Abigail L Mandel; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

Review 9.  An evolutionary perspective on food and human taste.

Authors:  Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Behavioral Evidence for More than One Taste Signaling Pathway for Sugars in Rats.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.