Literature DB >> 11880524

Rats fail to discriminate quinine from denatonium: implications for the neural coding of bitter-tasting compounds.

Alan C Spector1, Stacy L Kopka.   

Abstract

Recent molecular findings indicate that many different G-protein-coupled taste receptors that bind with "bitter-tasting" ligands are coexpressed in single taste receptor cells in taste buds, leading to the prediction that mammals can respond behaviorally to structurally diverse "bitter" tastants but cannot discriminate among them. However, recent in situ calcium-imaging findings imply that rat taste receptor cells are more narrowly tuned to respond to bitter-tasting compounds than had been predicted from molecular findings, suggesting that these animals can discriminate among these chemicals. Using an operant conditioning paradigm, we demonstrated that rats cannot discriminate between two structurally dissimilar bitter compounds, quinine hydrochloride and denatonium benzoate, despite the fact that these tastants are thought to stimulate different taste receptor cells. These rats were nonetheless able to show concentration-dependent avoidance responses to both compounds in brief-access tests and to discriminate among other taste stimuli, including quinine versus KCl, denatonium versus KCl, and NaCl versus KCl. Importantly, the concentrations were varied in the discrimination tests to render intensity an irrelevant cue. We conclude that denatonium and quinine produce a unitary taste sensation, leaving open the likely possibility that other compounds fall into this class. Although a broader array of compounds needs to be tested, our findings lend support to the hypothesis that there is only one qualitative type of bitterness. These results also highlight the need to confirm predictions about the downstream properties of the gustatory system, or any sensory system, based on upstream molecular and biophysical events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11880524      PMCID: PMC6758880     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

Review 1.  Linking gustatory neurobiology to behavior in vertebrates.

Authors:  A C Spector
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Taste detection and discrimination performance of rats following selective desalivation.

Authors:  G M Brosvic; N E Hoey
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1990-11

Review 3.  Gustducin and its role in taste.

Authors:  A I Spielman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.

Authors:  P A Breslin; G K Beauchamp; E N Pugh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

5.  Chorda tympani transection and selective desalivation differentially disrupt two-lever salt discrimination performance in rats.

Authors:  S J St John; S Markison; N A Guagliardo; T D Hackenberg; A C Spector
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Sucrose vs. maltose taste discrimination by rats depends on the input of the seventh cranial nerve.

Authors:  A C Spector; S Markison; S J St John; M Garcea
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-04

7.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Covariation in individuals' sensitivities to bitter compounds: evidence supporting multiple receptor/transduction mechanisms.

Authors:  J F Delwiche; Z Buletic; P A Breslin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

9.  Functional status of the regenerated chorda tympani nerve as assessed in a salt taste discrimination task.

Authors:  S L Kopka; L C Geran; A C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Amiloride disrupts NaCl versus KCl discrimination performance: implications for salt taste coding in rats.

Authors:  A C Spector; N A Guagliardo; S J St John
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  28 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  A new gustometer for taste testing in rodents.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Ginger D Blonde; Ross P Henderson; Yada Treesukosol; Paul Hendrick; Ryan Newsome; Fred H Fletcher; Te Tang; James A Donaldson
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Modulation of taste processing by temperature.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Limited taste discrimination in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Kristin Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Terry L Davidson; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Bitter-Induced Salivary Proteins Increase Detection Threshold of Quinine, But Not Sucrose.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Contribution of different taste cells and signaling pathways to the discrimination of "bitter" taste stimuli by an insect.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Adrienne Davis; Sudha Ramaswamy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.