Literature DB >> 7291240

Multiple receptor sites mediate sweetness: evidence from cross adaptation.

S S Schiffman, H Cahn, M G Lindley.   

Abstract

The method of cross adaptation was implemented to determine whether only one type of receptor site mediates the perception of sweetness, or whether more than one such type exists. Fourteen stimuli, seven artificial sweeteners varying widely in chemical structure as well as seven sugars, were cross adapted with one another. When a sugar was employed as the adapting stimulus, a consistent reduction in the intensity of the test solution's sweetness was found. However, the result of the cross adaptation when the adapting stimulus was an artificial sweetener was unpredictable; it led not only to a reduction but, in some cases, to an enhancement or no change in the test solution's intensity, depending on its identity. In previous investigations, enhancements have been explained through the existence of a water taste. Since this explanation is insufficient to account for the enhancement effects found in this study, it appears that cross adaptation does not always occur between sweet-tasting compounds. For this reason, it is concluded that more than one receptor mechanism may be responsible for the perception of the sweet quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7291240     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(81)90266-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  15 in total

1.  Unraveling the biochemistry of sweet and umami tastes.

Authors:  Grant E DuBois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptation in chemoreceptor cells. II. The effects of cross-adapting backgrounds depend on spectral tuning.

Authors:  P F Borroni; J Atema
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Taste cell-expressed α-glucosidase enzymes contribute to gustatory responses to disaccharides.

Authors:  Sunil K Sukumaran; Karen K Yee; Shusuke Iwata; Ramana Kotha; Roberto Quezada-Calvillo; Buford L Nichols; Sankar Mohan; B Mario Pinto; Noriatsu Shigemura; Yuzo Ninomiya; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

5.  Monogeusia for fructose, glucose, sucrose, and maltose.

Authors:  P A Breslin; G K Beauchamp; E N Pugh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

6.  Individual gustatory reaction times to various groups of chemicals that provoke basic taste qualities.

Authors:  Z Bujas; S Szabo; D Ajduković; D Mayer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-05

7.  Taste reception of binary sugar mixtures: psychophysical comparison of two models.

Authors:  R L McBride
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-08

8.  Evidence for peripheral and central processes in taste adaptation.

Authors:  D J Gillan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

Review 9.  Diverse tastes: Genetics of sweet and bitter perception.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Toshiko Tanaka; Amanda H McDaniel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-19

10.  Three sweet receptor genes are clustered in human chromosome 1.

Authors:  Jiayu Liao; Peter G Schultz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.