Literature DB >> 3614785

Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

J W Nissenbaum, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

A conditioned taste aversion paradigm was used to assess the qualitative similarities between the tastes of a polysaccharide (Polycose) solution and sugar solutions (sucrose, maltose, glucose, fructose). In Experiment I, three groups of female rats were water deprived and conditioned to avoid a 0.025 M Polycose, a 0.1 M sucrose, or a 0.1 M maltose solution by pairing solution consumption with a lithium chloride (LiCl) injection; in a control group water consumption was paired with the LiCl injection. The extent to which the experimental groups generalized their conditioned aversion to the other three solutions was then assessed. The Polycose-conditioned group avoided the maltose solution more than the sucrose solution, and the maltose-conditioned group avoided the Polycose solution more than the sucrose solution. The sucrose-conditioned group avoided the maltose and Polycose solutions to the same relatively low degree. In additional tests the three experimental groups showed similar aversions to a glucose solution, but only the sucrose-conditioned rats avoided a fructose solution. Rats in a second experiment also displayed relatively little cross-generalization between Polycose and sucrose aversions even though they were tested with different solution concentrations. Additional tests confirmed the results obtained in Experiment 1 with maltose, glucose, and fructose solutions, and also revealed that the sucrose-conditioned group, but not the Polycose-conditioned group avoided saccharin solutions. Neither Polycose- nor sucrose-conditioned groups avoided quinine, sodium chloride, or hydrochloric acid solutions. These results, along with other recent findings, suggest that rats have two types of "carbohydrate" taste receptors, one for polysaccharides and one for sucrose, which produce qualitatively distinct gustatory sensations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3614785     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  46 in total

1.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Reduced sweet and fatty fluid intake after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats is dependent on experience without change in stimulus motivational potency.

Authors:  Clare M Mathes; Ryan A Bohnenkamp; Carel W le Roux; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Assessing behavioral control across reinforcer solutions on a fixed-ratio schedule of reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  Joel E Shillinglaw; Ian K Everitt; Donita L Robinson
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Hyperphagia induced by sucrose: relation to circulating and CSF glucose and corticosterone and orexigenic peptides in the arcuate nucleus.

Authors:  V A Gaysinskaya; O Karatayev; J Shuluk; S F Leibowitz
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating KATP channels in taste cells.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Yonina G Frim; Ayelet Hochman; Gabrielle S Lubitz; Anthony J Basile; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

8.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.