Literature DB >> 8934850

What is inhibited in inhibition of return?

P A Reuter-Lorenz1, A P Jha, J N Rosenquist.   

Abstract

Research on temporal-order judgments, reference frames, discrimination tasks, and links to oculomotor control suggest important differences between inhibition of return (IOR) and attentional costs and benefits. Yet, it is generally assumed that IOR is an attentional effect even though there is little supporting evidence. The authors evaluated this assumption by examining how several factors that are known to influence attentional costs and benefits affect the magnitude of IOR: target modality, target intensity, and response mode. Results similar to those previously reported for attention were observed: IOR was greater for visual than for auditory targets, showed an inverse relationship with target intensity, and was equivalent for manual and saccadic responses. Important parallels between IOR and attentional costs and benefits are indicated, suggesting that, like attention, IOR may in part affect sensory-perceptual processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934850     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.2.367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  P T Quinlan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

3.  Inhibition of return: a graphical meta-analysis of its time course and an empirical test of its temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Donna Kat
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

5.  Inhibition of return: unraveling a paradox.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Troy A W Visser; Janice J Snyder; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

6.  Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.

Authors:  Larissa Vingilis-Jaremko; Susanne Ferber; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-07-24

7.  Disentangling perceptual and motor components in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Bin Zhou
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-08

8.  Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

Authors:  David Souto; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.