Literature DB >> 17647015

Better late than never: how onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.

Larissa Vingilis-Jaremko1, Susanne Ferber, Jay Pratt.   

Abstract

The three experiments presented in the paper examine visual prior entry (determining which of two stimuli appeared first) and prior exit (determining which of two stimuli disappeared first) effects with a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task. In addition to using onset and offset targets, the preceding cues also consisted of either onset or offset stimuli. Typical, and equivalent, prior entry effects were found when either onset or offset cues preceded the onset targets. Unexpectedly large prior exit effects where found with the offset targets, with offset cues producing greater capture effects than onset cues. These findings are consistent with the notion that more attention is allocated to searching the visual field when targets are more difficult to find. In addition, the results indicate that attentional control settings may be more likely to occur with more difficult searches. In addition, these findings demonstrate that TOJ tasks provide extremely precise measures of the allocation of attention and are very sensitive to a range of task manipulations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17647015     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0120-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  22 in total

1.  Visual prior entry.

Authors:  D I Shore; C Spence; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

2.  Components of visual prior entry.

Authors:  Keith A Schneider; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  James C Craig; Thomas A Busey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

4.  Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2004-11-24

5.  Pro-saccades and anti-saccades to onset and offset targets.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Leo Trottier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Oculomotor consequences of abrupt object onsets and offsets: onsets dominate oculomotor capture.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Arthur F Kramer; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

7.  Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

8.  Perceived onset simultaneity of stimuli with unequal durations.

Authors:  P Jaśkowski
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.

Authors:  B S Gibson; E M Kelsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Adult age differences in the time course of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa; Jay Pratt
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatial Stroop and spatial orienting: the role of onset versus offset cues.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; Xiaolan Fu; Xuchu Weng
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-08-20

2.  Fast and Conspicuous? Quantifying Salience With the Theory of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Alexander Krüger; Jan Tünnermann; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

3.  No prior entry for threat-related faces: evidence from temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Antonio Schettino; Tom Loeys; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.