Literature DB >> 19424686

Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.

David Souto1, Dirk Kerzel.   

Abstract

After presentation of a peripheral cue, facilitation at the cued location is followed by inhibition of return (IOR). It has been recently proposed that IOR may originate at different processing stages for manual and ocular responses, with manual IOR resulting from inhibited attentional orienting, and ocular IOR resulting form inhibited motor preparation. Contrary to this interpretation, we found an effect of target contrast on saccadic IOR. The effect of contrast decreased with increasing reaction times (RTs) for saccades, but not for manual key-press responses. This may have masked the effect of contrast on IOR with saccades in previous studies (Hunt and Kingstone in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:1068-1074, 2003) because only mean RTs were considered. We also found that background luminance strongly influenced the effects of gap and target contrast on IOR.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19424686     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1824-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.

Authors:  A Kingstone; J Pratt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Composition of geniculostriate input ot superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  P H Schiller; J G Malpeli; S J Schein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Alla Ignashchenkova; Peter W Dicke; Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Inhibition of return in temporal order saccades.

Authors:  Chiang-shan Ray Li; Shih-chieh Lin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Supporting the attentional momentum view of IOR: is attention biased to go right?

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Sherief Hammad
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-02

6.  Attentional modulation of the gap effect.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Clara M Lajonchere; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Inhibition of return is not detected using illusory line motion.

Authors:  W C Schmidt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

8.  Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.

Authors:  H L Hawkins; M G Shafto; K Richardson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

9.  The gap effect and inhibition of return: interactive effects on eye movement latencies.

Authors:  R A Abrams; R S Dobkin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Which visual pathways cause fixation-related inhibition?

Authors:  Petroc Sumner; Parashkev Nachev; Sarah Castor-Perry; Heather Isenman; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ueda; Kohske Takahashi; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes.

Authors:  Matthew D Hilchey; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

3.  Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Mengying Yuan; Zhongyu Shi; Min Gao; Rongxia Ren; Ming Wei; Yulin Gao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.004

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.