Literature DB >> 16507056

Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.

Ulrich W Weger1, Albrecht W Inhoff.   

Abstract

A spatial cuing task was used to identify two types of readers, those with a relatively fast and those with a relatively slow buildup of inhibition of return (IOR). Backward-directed eye movements (regressions) during sentence reading were then examined as a function of the two IOR types. The results revealed that readers with fast IOR executed larger regressions than readers with slow IOR, as they directed the eyes away from the most recently attended area of text. Forward-directed eye movements (saccades), by contrast, were not a function of IOR type. Ease of sentence comprehension influenced the size of regressions, but this effect was also independent of IOR type. Multiple mechanisms of spatial attention, including IOR, bias eye movements toward upcoming words in the text during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16507056      PMCID: PMC2694615          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  13 in total

1.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Inhibition of return in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  T Ro; J Pratt; R D Rafal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Inhibition of return and visual search: how many separate loci are inhibited?

Authors:  J J Snyder; A Kingstone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-04

4.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Semantic processing of unattended text during selective reading: how the eyes see it.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; D Briihl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

Review 6.  The attention system of the human brain.

Authors:  M I Posner; S E Petersen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  What is inhibited in inhibition of return?

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; A P Jha; J N Rosenquist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Covert attention and eye movements during reading.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; A Pollatsek; M I Posner; K Rayner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1989-02

9.  The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; G E Raney; L Lagasse; K Rayner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1993-06

10.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; S Bolozky; A D Well; K Rayner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.381

View more
  6 in total

1.  Temporal overlap in the linguistic processing of successive words in reading: reply to Pollatsek, Reichle, and Rayner (2006a).

Authors:  Albrecht W Inhoff; Ralph Radach; Brianna Eiter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

3.  Neural intersections of the phonological, visual magnocellular and motor/cerebellar systems in normal readers: implications for imaging studies on dyslexia.

Authors:  Laura Danelli; Manuela Berlingeri; Gabriella Bottini; Francesca Ferri; Laura Vacchi; Maurizio Sberna; Eraldo Paulesu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Attention as foraging for information and value.

Authors:  Sanjay G Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-02

6.  Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun; Chen Chen; Amanda Heffner-Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.