Literature DB >> 8934686

Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: effects of temporal distance.

R S Newman1, J R Sawusch.   

Abstract

A series of studies was undertaken to examine how rate normalization in speech perception would be influenced by the similarity, duration, and phonotactics of phonemes that were adjacent or distal from the initial, target phoneme. The duration of the adjacent (following) phoneme always had an effect on perception of the initial target. Neither phonotactics nor acoustic similarity seemed to have any influence on this rate normalization effect. However, effects of the duration of the nonadjacent (distal) phoneme were only found when that phoneme was temporally close to the target. These results suggest that there is a temporal window over which rate normalization occurs. In most cases, only the adjacent phoneme or adjacent two phonemes will fall within this window and thus influence perception of a phoneme distinction.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934686     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; P C DELATTRE; L J GERSTMAN; F S COOPER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-08

2.  Amplitude rise time and the perception of the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction.

Authors:  K R Kluender; M A Walsh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

3.  Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech.

Authors:  T H Crystal; A S House
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides.

Authors:  R L Diehl; M A Walsh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals.

Authors:  D B Pisoni; T D Carrell; S J Gans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

6.  Talker continuity and the use of rate information during phonetic perception.

Authors:  K P Green; E B Stevens; P K Kuhl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

7.  Some effects of speaking rate on the production of /b/ and /w/.

Authors:  J L Miller; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception.

Authors:  W F Ganong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner.

Authors:  B H Repp; A M Liberman; T Eccardt; D Pesetsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  14 in total

1.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Probability distributions of the logarithm of inter-spike intervals yield accurate entropy estimates from small datasets.

Authors:  Alan D Dorval
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of speaking rate on recognition of synthetic and natural speech by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Laura C Dilley; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell; Christine A Whalen; Samantha Gereg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Perceptual normalization for speaking rate III: Effects of the rate of one voice on perception of another.

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2009-01-01

9.  New tests of the distal speech rate effect: examining cross-linguistic generalization.

Authors:  Laura C Dilley; Tuuli H Morrill; Elina Banzina
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-30

10.  Time-warp-invariant neuronal processing.

Authors:  Robert Gütig; Haim Sompolinsky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.