Literature DB >> 17091133

The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.

Lori L Holt1.   

Abstract

Adjacent speech, and even nonspeech, contexts influence phonetic categorization. Four experiments investigated how preceding sequences of sine-wave tones influence phonetic categorization. This experimental paradigm provides a means of investigating the statistical regularities of acoustic events that influence online speech categorization and, reciprocally, reveals regularities of the sound environment tracked by auditory processing. The tones comprising the sequences were drawn from distributions sampling different acoustic frequencies. Results indicate that whereas the mean of the distributions predicts contrastive shifts in speech categorization, variability of the distributions has little effect. Moreover, speech categorization is influenced by the global mean of the tone sequence, without significant influence of local statistical regularities within the tone sequence. Further arguing that the effect is strongly related to the average spectrum of the sequence, notched noise spectral complements of the tone sequences produce a complementary effect on speech categorization. Lastly, these effects are modulated by the number of tones in the acoustic history and the overall duration of the sequence, but not by the density with which the distribution defining the sequence is sampled. Results are discussed in light of stimulus-specific adaptation to statistical regularity in the acoustic input and a speculative link to talker normalization is postulated.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17091133      PMCID: PMC1635014          DOI: 10.1121/1.2354071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  47 in total

1.  Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans.

Authors:  C A Fowler; J M Brown; V A Mann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons.

Authors:  Nachum Ulanovsky; Liora Las; Israel Nelken
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification.

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Sarah C Sullivan; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Feature parsing: feature cue mapping in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  David W Gow
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

5.  Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006).

Authors:  Andrew J Lotto; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

6.  The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated word forms.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Valéria Csépe; Leo Blomert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-08

8.  Extrinsic context affects perceptual normalization of lexical tone.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Valter Ciocca; Natalie King Yu Wong; Wilson Ho Yin Leung; Phoebe Cheuk Yan Chu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech categorization in context: joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Incidental categorization of spectrally complex non-invariant auditory stimuli in a computer game task.

Authors:  Travis Wade; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  38 in total

1.  Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: sensory and decisional effects.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Christophe Micheyl; Mieke Vanbussel; Claudia S Schreiner; Daniel Mendelsohn; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Contextual effects in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Virginia M Richards; Timothy Streeter; Christine R Mason; Rong Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal properties of perceptual calibration to local and broad spectral characteristics of a listening context.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Contingent categorization in speech perception.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Natasha Bullock-Rest; Ariane E Rhone; Allard Jongman; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  General perceptual contributions to lexical tone normalization.

Authors:  Jingyuan Huang; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Speech Perception Within an Auditory Cognitive Science Framework.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2008

8.  Tests of a Dual-systems Model of Speech Category Learning.

Authors:  W Todd Maddox; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2014-10-01

9.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The phonotactic influence on the perception of a consonant cluster /pt/ by native English and native Polish listeners: a behavioral and event related potential (ERP) study.

Authors:  Monica Wagner; Valerie L Shafer; Brett Martin; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.