Literature DB >> 18763905

Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.

Jill A Warker1, Gary S Dell, Christine A Whalen, Samantha Gereg.   

Abstract

Adults can learn new artificial phonotactic constraints by producing syllables that exhibit the constraints. The experiments presented here tested the limits of phonotactic learning in production using speech errors as an implicit measure of learning. Experiment 1 tested a constraint in which the placement of a consonant as an onset or coda depended on the identity of a nonadjacent consonant. Participant speech errors reflected knowledge of the constraint but not until the 2nd day of testing. Experiment 2 tested a constraint in which consonant placement depended on an extralinguistic factor, the speech rate. Participants were not able to learn this constraint. Together, these experiments suggest that phonotactic-like constraints are acquired when mutually constraining elements reside within the phonological system. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18763905      PMCID: PMC2965584          DOI: 10.1037/a0013033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  12 in total

1.  Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production.

Authors:  G S Dell; K D Reed; D R Adams; A S Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.

Authors:  Kristine H Onishi; Kyle E Chambers; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

3.  Stimulus variability and the phonetic relevance hypothesis: effects of variability in speaking style, fundamental frequency, and speaking rate on spoken word identification.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Joe Barcroft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints.

Authors:  Conrad F Taylor; George Houghton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Heeding the voice of experience: the role of talker variation in lexical access.

Authors:  Sarah C Creel; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-15

7.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.

Authors:  S D Goldinger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

Authors:  G S Dell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-03

10.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies.

Authors:  Elissa L Newport; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Anderson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Grace Man; Victor Ferreira; Nicholas Gruberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience.

Authors:  Jill A Warker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Speech errors reflect the phonotactic constraints in recently spoken syllables, but not in recently heard syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Ye Xu; Gary S Dell; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-04-26

7.  Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar networks.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Robert Daland
Journal:  Phonology       Date:  2009

8.  Just give it time: Differential effects of disruption and delay on perceptual learning.

Authors:  Melissa M Baese-Berk; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not.

Authors:  Yuan Bian; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

10.  Behavioral and Neurodynamic Effects of Word Learning on Phonotactic Repair.

Authors:  David W Gow; Adriana Schoenhaut; Enes Avcu; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.