Literature DB >> 8905507

Didactic value of the clinical evaluation exercise. Missed opportunities.

F J Kroboth1, B H Hanusa, S C Parker.   

Abstract

The clinical evaluation exercise (CEX), a direct observation of trainees' clinical skills, is a common method of house officer evaluation. During our studies of its reliability, the extent of the CEX's didactic value surfaced. This brief report describes the amount of information passed from the evaluator to the house officer in 73 CEXs. On average, evaluators made eight teaching points in postexamination sessions. However, there were as many points recorded on the CEX forms that evaluators never mentioned. In a subset of CEXs carried out with two observers present, agreement in the teaching points presented to the house officer within the pairs witnessing the same examination was 18%. Positive feedback constituted 9% to 12% of the points presented. Our observations suggest that the more systematic feedback mechanisms may enhance the didactic value of the CEX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8905507     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  13 in total

1.  Results of a survey on the use of standardized patients to teach and evaluate clinical skills.

Authors:  P L Stillman; M B Regan; M Philbin; H L Haley
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Providing feedback to students on clinical skills by using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

Authors:  N M Black; R M Harden
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  A comparative trial of the clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; W Kapoor; F H Brown; M Karpf; G S Levey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-06

4.  Feedback in clinical medical education.

Authors:  J Ende
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Utilization of simulated patients to teach the routine pelvic examination.

Authors:  T R Godkins; D Duffy; J Greenwood; W D Stanhope
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1974-12

6.  Direct observation as a means of teaching and evaluating clinical skills.

Authors:  C F Hinz
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1966-02

7.  A controlled experiment in teaching students to respond to patients' emotional concerns.

Authors:  F M Wolf; J O Woolliscroft; J G Calhoun; G J Boxer
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-01

8.  The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  J J Norcini; L L Blank; G K Arnold; H R Kimball
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S Parker; J L Coulehan; W N Kapoor; F H Brown; M Karpf; G S Levey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The use of instructor-patients to teach physical examination techniques.

Authors:  K K Anderson; T C Meyer
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1978-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.