Literature DB >> 6876333

Feedback in clinical medical education.

J Ende.   

Abstract

In the setting of clinical medical education, feedback refers to information describing students' or house officers' performance in a given activity that is intended to guide their future performance in that same or in a related activity. It is a key step in the acquisition of clinical skills, yet feedback is often omitted or handled improperly in clinical training. This can result in important untoward consequences, some of which may extend beyond the training period. Once the nature of the feedback process is appreciated, however, especially the distinction between feedback and evaluation and the importance of focusing on the trainees' observable behaviors rather than on the trainees themselves, the educational benefit of feedback can be realized. This article presents guidelines for offering feedback that have been set forth in the literature of business administration, psychology, and education, adapted here for use by teachers and students of clinical medicine.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6876333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  222 in total

Review 1.  The role of simulation in surgical training.

Authors:  J Torkington; S G Smith; B I Rees; A Darzi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Evaluating ambulatory resident practice using an Internet-based system.

Authors:  J Shammash; M Callahan; J Mele; F Pelzman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A picture is worth a thousand words: practical use of videotape in teaching.

Authors:  L E Pinsky; J E Wipf
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Supporting the moral development of medical students.

Authors:  W T Branch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Learning oral presentation skills: a rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications.

Authors:  R J Haber; L A Lingard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Interactive faculty development seminars improve the quality of written feedback in ambulatory teaching.

Authors:  Stephen M Salerno; Jeffrey L Jackson; Patrick G O'Malley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  [Problem-based learning in medical education. Integrated "Nervous System and Behavior" course at the Munich Ludwig Maximilian University].

Authors:  H Grunze; M Strupp; T Rönneberg; R Putz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Meeting requirements and changing culture. The development of a web-based clinical skills evaluation system.

Authors:  Marc M Triola; Henry J Feldman; Ellen B Pearlman; Adina L Kalet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Monica Yepes; Frederick Williams; Stephen J Huot
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The teacher simulation exercise: changes in physician teaching emphasis and strategy. The SGIM Task Force on the Medical Interview.

Authors:  K Rost; G H Gordon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.