Literature DB >> 3951381

Providing feedback to students on clinical skills by using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

N M Black, R M Harden.   

Abstract

Student opinions of some methods of how and when to provide feedback on clinical skills in the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) were gathered. Feedback with their marked checklists plus a model videorecording was preferred to either on its own. Feedback was preferred during the examination rather than after it. No undue stress appeared to be associated with receiving feedback during the examination. Valuable extra instruction to students can be provided with minimal staff input.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3951381     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01041.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

1.  Didactic value of the clinical evaluation exercise. Missed opportunities.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S C Parker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Recent developments in assessing medical students.

Authors:  S L Fowell; J G Bligh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Use of the objective structured clinical examination for assessment of vocational trainees for general practice.

Authors:  R Walker; B Walker
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-03

4.  A near-peer teaching program designed, developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduates for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).

Authors:  Mustafa S Rashid; Oluwaseun Sobowale; David Gore
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Tablet versus paper marking in assessment: feedback matters.

Authors:  Alan Denison; Emily Bate; Jessica Thompson
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2016-04

6.  "Shadow" OSCE examiner. A cross-sectional study comparing the "shadow" examiner with the original OSCE examiner format.

Authors:  Marcelo Arlindo Vasconcelos Rodrigues; Rodrigo Diaz Olmos; Célia Maria Kira; Paulo Andrade Lotufo; Itamar Souza Santos; Iolanda de Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Feedback after OSCE: A comparison of face to face versus an enhanced written feedback.

Authors:  Chin Fang Ngim; Paul Douglas Fullerton; Vanassa Ratnasingam; Valliammai Jayanthi Thirunavuk Arasoo; Nisha Angela Dominic; Cindy Pei Sze Niap; Sivakumar Thurairajasingam
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.