Literature DB >> 2337429

Results of a survey on the use of standardized patients to teach and evaluate clinical skills.

P L Stillman1, M B Regan, M Philbin, H L Haley.   

Abstract

In 1989, a survey was sent to each U.S. and Canadian medical school requesting information about how standardized patients are used for teaching and evaluating clinical skills, and 95% of the schools responded. Although there was widespread use of standardized patients throughout the curricula, the role and training of these patients varied markedly within a given school as well as across schools. One outcome of this survey is the development of a network to share resources, protocols, and training material to enhance the development of this educational strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2337429     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199005000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

Review 1.  How should we be teaching our undergraduates?

Authors:  J E Dacre; R A Fox
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  ORGANIZATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE ANESTHESIOLOGY ORAL PRACTICE EXAMINATION PROGRAM: Planning, Structure, Startup, Administration, Growth and Evaluation.

Authors:  A Schubert; J Tetzlaff; M Licina; E Mascha; M P Smith
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  1999-05-01

3.  Large-scale use of an objective, structured clinical examination for licensing family physicians.

Authors:  P Grand'Maison; J Lescop; P Rainsberry; C A Brailovsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Didactic value of the clinical evaluation exercise. Missed opportunities.

Authors:  F J Kroboth; B H Hanusa; S C Parker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Impact of Standardized Simulated Patients on First-Year Pharmacy Students' Knowledge Retention of Insulin Injection Technique and Counseling Skills.

Authors:  Riley Bowers; Robert Tunney; Kim Kelly; Beth Mills; Katie Trotta; C Neil Wheeless; Richard Drew
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Key challenges in simulated patient programs: an international comparative case study.

Authors:  Debra Nestel; Diana Tabak; Tanya Tierney; Carine Layat-Burn; Anja Robb; Susan Clark; Tracy Morrison; Norma Jones; Rachel Ellis; Cathy Smith; Nancy McNaughton; Kerry Knickle; Jenny Higham; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 7.  Birth, death, and resurrection of the physical examination: clinical and academic perspectives on bedside diagnosis.

Authors:  A J Peixoto
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

8.  Transforming the Patient Role to Achieve Better Outcomes Through a Patient Empowerment Program: A Randomized Wait-List Control Trial Protocol.

Authors:  Lisa Altshuler; Joseph Plaksin; Sondra Zabar; Andrew Wallach; Chester Sawicki; Sarita Kundrod; Adina Kalet
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-04-21

9.  Physical examination skills training: Faculty staff vs. patient instructor feedback-A controlled trial.

Authors:  Markus Krautter; Katja Diefenbacher; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Imad Maatouk; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Nadja Koehl-Hackert; Wolfgang Herzog; Christoph Nikendei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting.

Authors:  Eleonora D T Fagundes; Cássio C Ibiapina; Cristina G Alvim; Rachel A F Fernandes; Marco Antônio Carvalho-Filho; Paul L P Brand
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.