Literature DB >> 8831520

Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures.

T L Hull1, I Kobe, V W Fazio.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine if a stapled side-to-side closure of an ileostomy results in decreased length of hospital stay compared with a handsewn closure.
METHODS: From March 1993 to August 1994, patients who had previously undergone total proctocolectomy with pelvic pouch formation and loop ileostomy were studied. At the time of ileostomy closure, patients were randomized to have their stoma closed by a handsewn technique or stapled closure. Data were prospectively gathered.
RESULTS: During 17 months, 61 consecutive patients (38 male, 23 female) with a mean age of 37.8 (range, 16-69) years had their ileostomy closed and were entered into this study. There were 31 patients in the stapled group and 30 in the handsewn group. Mean operative time was 55 (range, 32-97) minutes in the stapled group and 67 (range, 42-128) minutes in the handsewn group (P = 0.01 Wilcoxon's test). Average length of stay was three (range, 2-5) days in the stapled group and 2.5 (range, 1-19) days in the handsewn group. One patient from the stapled group and two patients from the handsewn group were readmitted because of small-bowel obstruction. One patient from the stapled group underwent additional surgery for a leaking enterotomy with no defect in staple closure. Two patients from the handsewn group underwent additional surgery for small-bowel obstruction. There was no significant difference in day of first stool or day of solid diet for the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Handsewn and stapled closures of loop ileostomy are not significantly different with respect to day of first stool, day until solid diet, or discharge day. Complications were similar in the two groups. Stapled closure is significantly quicker than handsewn closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831520     DOI: 10.1007/bf02081405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  22 in total

1.  Testing for anastomotic integrity after reversal of loop ileostomy.

Authors:  M S Metcalfe; D Hemingway
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Loop ileostomy closure: comparison of cost effectiveness between suture and stapler.

Authors:  Karoline Horisberger; Guido Beldi; Daniel Candinas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Predictors for complications after loop stoma closure in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Herwig Pokorny; Harald Herkner; Raimund Jakesz; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Terry T W Leung; Anthony R MacLean; W Donald Buie; Elijah Dixon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; E L Sugerman; J G Meador; H H Newsome; J M Kellum; E J DeMaria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma--differences according to closure technique.

Authors:  Kajsa Gustavsson; Ulf Gunnarsson; Pia Jestin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Stapled ileostomy closure results in reduction of postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Y A Shelygin; S V Chernyshov; E G Rybakov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Postoperative management after loop ileostomy closure: are we keeping patients in hospital too long?

Authors:  W Baraza; J Wild; W Barber; S Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.