Literature DB >> 10998651

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion.

H J Sugerman1, E L Sugerman, J G Meador, H H Newsome, J M Kellum, E J DeMaria.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate continued experience with a one-stage stapled ileoanal pouch procedure without temporary ileostomy diversion. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Most centers perform colectomy, proctectomy, and ileal pouch anal anastomoses (IPAA) with a protective ileostomy. Following a previous report, the authors performed 126 additional stapled IPAA procedures for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, of which all but 2 were without an ileostomy. Outcomes in these patients question the need for temporary ileal diversion, with its complications and need for subsequent surgical closure.
METHODS: Two hundred one patients underwent a stapled IPAA since May 1989, 192 as a one-stage procedure without ileostomy, and 1 with a concurrent Whipple procedure for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Patient charts were reviewed or patients were contacted by phone to evaluate their clinical status at least 1 year after their surgery.
RESULTS: Among the patients who underwent the one-stage procedure, 178 had ulcerative colitis (38 fulminant), 5 had Crohn's disease (diagnosed after IPAA), 1 had indeterminate colitis, and 8 had familial adenomatous polyposis. The mean age was 38 +/- 7 (range 7--70) years; there were 98 male patients and 94 female patients. The average amount of diseased tissue between the dentate line and the anastomosis was 0.9 +/- 0.1 cm, with 35% of the anastomoses at the dentate line. With 89% follow-up at 1 year or more (mean 5.1 +/- 2.4 years) after surgery, the average 24-hour stool frequency was 7.1 +/- 3.3, of which 0.9 +/- 1.4 were at night. Daytime stool control was 95% and night-time control was 90%. Only 2.3% needed to wear a perineal pad. Average length of hospital stay was 10 +/- 0.3 days, with 1.5 +/- 0.5 days readmission for complications. Abscesses or enteric leaks occurred in 23 patients; IPAA function was excellent in 19 of these patients (2 have permanent ileostomies). In patients taking steroids, there was no significant difference in leak rate with duration of use (29 +/- 8 with vs. 22 +/- 2 months without leak) or dose (32 +/- 13 mg with vs. 35 +/- 3 mg without leak). Two (1%) patients died (myocardial infarction, mesenteric infarction).
CONCLUSIONS: The triple-stapled IPAA without temporary ileal diversion has a relatively low complication rate and a low rate of small bowel obstruction, provides excellent fecal control, permits an early return to a functional life, and can be performed in morbidly obese and older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10998651      PMCID: PMC1421185          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  58 in total

1.  Vaginal fistula following restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  P Y Lee; V W Fazio; J M Church; T L Hull; K W Eu; I C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Neoplastic transformation of the pelvic pouch mucosa in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  K Gullberg; D Ståhlberg; L Liljeqvist; B Tribukait; F P Reinholt; B Veress; R Löfberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Is age relevant to functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis?: prospective assessment of 122 cases.

Authors:  Y Takao; R Gilliland; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  One-stage restorative proctocolectomy without temporary ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: a note of caution.

Authors:  M E Williamson; W G Lewis; P M Sagar; P J Holdsworth; D Johnston
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Effect of systemic steroids on ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Y Ziv; J M Church; V W Fazio; T M King; I C Lavery
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosa.

Authors:  W T Reilly; J H Pemberton; B G Wolff; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; W J Litchy; P B McIntyre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Restorative proctocolectomy in patients older than fifty years.

Authors:  J J Bauer; S R Gorfine; I M Gelernt; M T Harris; I Kreel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Adenocarcinoma arising in "J" pouch after total proctocolectomy for familial polyposis coli.

Authors:  V M Palkar; L J deSouza; P Jagannath; K N Naresh
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.224

9.  Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures.

Authors:  T L Hull; I Kobe; V W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Functional outcome of the double stapled ileoanal reservoir in patients more than 60 years of age.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.

Authors:  P Kienle; J Weitz; A Benner; C Herfarth; J Schmidt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience.

Authors:  David W Larson; Robert R Cima; Eric J Dozois; Michael Davies; Karen Piotrowicz; Sunni A Barnes; Bruce Wolff; John Pemberton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Silvestro Canonico; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Complications of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  Emre Gorgun; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

5.  Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery.

Authors:  Peter W G Carne; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

6.  Defunctioning ileostomy following restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Baljit Singh; Neil Mortensen; Andrew J Shorthouse
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Ten years experience of one-stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  M Davies; P R Hawley
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Clinical results after restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ikeuchi; Yasutsugu Shoji; Masato Kusunoki; Hidenori Yanagi; Masafumi Noda; Takehira Yamamura
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Does an ileoanal pouch offer a better quality of life than a permanent ileostomy for patients with ulcerative colitis?

Authors:  John Camilleri-Brennan; Alexander Munro; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.