Literature DB >> 8784687

Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

D E Barnes1, L A Bero.   

Abstract

The Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR) was created by three United States tobacco companies in 1988. Its stated mission is to fund high-quality, objective research related to indoor air, including studies of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Because CIAR is financed by the tobacco industry and funds research related to tobacco, it fosters an inherent conflict of interest. We consider whether this conflict of interest has affected the content, quality, or use of research funded by CIAR. We hypothesize that the tobacco industry might be using CIAR to develop scientific data to support its position that ETS is not harmful to health. CIAR funds two types of projects: "Peer-reviewed" projects are awarded after peer review by a group of scientists, whereas "special-reviewed" projects are awarded directly by tobacco industry executives. CIAR's special-reviewed projects are more likely than its peer-reviewed projects to be related to ETS, to support the tobacco industry position, and to be used by the industry to argue that smoking should not be regulated in public places. Our findings suggest that the tobacco industry is funding special-reviewed projects through CIAR to develop scientific data that it can use in legislative and legal settings. The industry may be financing peer-reviewed projects through CIAR to enhance its credibility, to provide good publicity, and to divert attention from ETS as an indoor air pollutant. CIAR's stated mission of funding high-quality, objective research has been compromised by conflict of interest, and at least some of CIAR's projects are being used to promote the tobacco industry's agenda.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8784687     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  62 in total

1.  Blowing smoke: how cigarette manufacturers argued that nicotine is not addictive.

Authors:  J Sharfstein
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

Authors:  M E Muggli; J L Forster; R D Hurt; J L Repace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development.

Authors:  T Montini; L A Bero
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Science, politics, and ideology in the campaign against environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Ronald Bayer; James Colgrove
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Support for tobacco control policies: how congruent are the attitudes of legislators and the public?

Authors:  Nicole A de Guia; Joanna E Cohen; Mary Jane Ashley; Linda Pederson; Roberta Ferrence; Shelley Bull; David Northrup; Blake Poland
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

7.  How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Hong; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

Review 8.  "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.

Authors:  L Trotter; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  "We are anxious to remain anonymous": the use of third party scientific and medical consultants by the Australian tobacco industry, 1969 to 1979.

Authors:  S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist.

Authors:  N Fields; S Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.