Literature DB >> 11684593

Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

E K Ong1, S A Glantz.   

Abstract

The tobacco industry has attacked "junk science" to discredit the evidence that secondhand smoke-among other environmental toxins-causes disease. Philip Morris used public relations firms and lawyers to develop a "sound science" program in the United States and Europe that involved recruiting other industries and issues to obscure the tobacco industry's role. The European "sound science" plans included a version of "good epidemiological practices" that would make it impossible to conclude that secondhand smoke-and thus other environmental toxins-caused diseases. Public health professionals need to be aware that the "sound science" movement is not an indigenous effort from within the profession to improve the quality of scientific discourse, but reflects sophisticated public relations campaigns controlled by industry executives and lawyers whose aim is to manipulate the standards of scientific proof to serve the corporate interests of their clients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684593      PMCID: PMC1446868          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  28 in total

Review 1.  The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation.

Authors:  J M Price; E S Rosenberg
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Multicenter case-control study of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in Europe.

Authors:  P Boffetta; A Agudo; W Ahrens; E Benhamou; S Benhamou; S C Darby; G Ferro; C Fortes; C A Gonzalez; K H Jöckel; M Krauss; L Kreienbrock; M Kreuzer; A Mendes; F Merletti; F Nyberg; G Pershagen; H Pohlabeln; E Riboli; G Schmid; L Simonato; J Trédaniel; E Whitley; H E Wichmann; C Winck; P Zambon; R Saracci
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Court affirms judges' right to reject 'junk science'.

Authors:  T Reichhardt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?

Authors:  G D Smith; A N Phillips
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-12

5.  Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. California Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors: 
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

8.  The discipline of epidemiology.

Authors:  D Trichopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The discipline of epidemiology.

Authors:  W Willett; S Greenland; B MacMahon; D Trichopoulos; K Rothman; D Thomas; M Thun; N Weiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Findings from the American College of Epidemiology's survey on Ethics guidelines. The American College of Epidemiology Ethics and Standards of Practice Committee.

Authors:  R J Prineas; K Goodman; C L Soskolne; G Buck; M Feinleib; J Last; J S Andrews
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.797

View more
  60 in total

1.  Junking science to promote tobacco.

Authors:  D Yach; S A Bialous
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking.

Authors:  J M Samet; T A Burke
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The tobacco industry's use of Wall Street analysts in shaping policy.

Authors:  B C Alamar; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  The tobacco industry's response to the COMMIT Trial: an analysis of legacy tobacco documents.

Authors:  Beatriz H Carlini; Donaid L Patrick; Abigail C Halperin; Verena Santos
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 5.  "Care and feeding": the Asian environmental tobacco smoke consultants programme.

Authors:  M Assunta; N Fields; J Knight; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Litigation in Argentina: challenging the tobacco industry.

Authors:  M L Flores; J Barnoya; R Mejia; E Alderete; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Erosion of the integrity of public health science in the USA.

Authors:  R Clapp; P Hoppin; D Kriebel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Seven deadly sins of environmental epidemiology and the virtues of precaution.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 9.  Late insights into early origins of disease.

Authors:  Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.080

10.  Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report Curbing the Epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.