Literature DB >> 12036788

Science, politics, and ideology in the campaign against environmental tobacco smoke.

Ronald Bayer1, James Colgrove.   

Abstract

The issue of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the harms it causes to nonsmoking bystanders has occupied a central place in the rhetoric and strategy of antismoking forces in the United States over the past 3 decades. Beginning in the 1970s, anti-tobacco activists drew on suggestive and incomplete evidence to push for far-reaching prohibitions on smoking in a variety of public settings. Public health professionals and other antismoking activists, although concerned about the potential illness and death that ETS might cause in nonsmokers, also used restrictions on public smoking as a way to erode the social acceptability of cigarettes and thereby reduce smoking prevalence. This strategy was necessitated by the context of American political culture, especially the hostility toward public health interventions that are overtly paternalistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036788      PMCID: PMC1447493          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.6.949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  Outdoor smoking bans: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  M Bloch; D R Shopland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Banning outdoor smoking is scientifically justifiable.

Authors:  J Repace
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Even a little secondhand smoke is dangerous.

Authors:  S A Glantz; W W Parmley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Editorial: Smoking and nonsmokers - what is the issue?

Authors:  G L Huber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The U.S. experience in nonsmokers' rights.

Authors:  R W Schmidt
Journal:  Am Lung Assoc Bull       Date:  1975-12

6.  Acute effects of passive smoking on the coronary circulation in healthy young adults.

Authors:  R Otsuka; H Watanabe; K Hirata; K Tokai; T Muro; M Yoshiyama; K Takeuchi; J Yoshikawa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.

Authors:  T Hirayama
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-01-17

8.  (Passive) smokers versus (voluntary) smokers.

Authors:  C Lenfant; B M Liu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Small-airways dysfunction in nonsmokers chronically exposed to tobacco smoke.

Authors:  J R White; H F Froeb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Lung cancer and passive smoking.

Authors:  D Trichopoulos; A Kalandidi; L Sparros; B MacMahon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1981-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  9 in total

1.  Out of the ashes: the life, death, and rebirth of the "safer" cigarette in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Fairchild; James Colgrove
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Smoking on both sides of the pacific: home smoking restrictions and secondhand smoke exposure among Korean adults and children in Seoul and California.

Authors:  John W Ayers; C Richard Hofstetter; Suzanne C Hughes; Haeryun Park; Hee-Young Paik; Veronica L Irvin; Jooeun Lee; Hee-Soon Juon; Carl Latkin; Melbourne F Hovell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Manifold restraints: liberty, public health, and the legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts.

Authors:  James Colgrove; Ronald Bayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Activating lay health influencers to promote tobacco cessation.

Authors:  Myra L Muramoto; John R Hall; Mark Nichter; Mimi Nichter; Mikel Aickin; Tim Connolly; Eva Matthews; Jean Z Campbell; Harry A Lando
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2014-05

5.  Reshuffling and relocating: the gendered and income-related differential effects of restricting smoking locations.

Authors:  Natalie Hemsing; Lorraine Greaves; Nancy Poole; Joan Bottorff
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2012-04-24

6.  An observational study of the secondary effects of a local smoke-free ordinance.

Authors:  Amy A Williamson; Brion J Fox; Paul D Creswell; Xiaodong Kuang; Sudakshina L Ceglarek; Aaron M Brower; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Public, private and personal: qualitative research on policymakers' opinions on smokefree interventions to protect children in 'private' spaces.

Authors:  Gareth Rouch; George Thomson; Nick Wilson; Sheena Hudson; Richard Edwards; Heather Gifford; Tolotea Lanumata
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Foucault, surveillance, and carbon monoxide testing within stop-smoking services.

Authors:  Aimee Grant; Kathryn Ashton; Rhiannon Phillips
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2014-10-07

9.  Evidence and argument in policymaking: development of workplace smoking legislation.

Authors:  Dorie E Apollonio; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.