Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.

× No keyword cloud information.

17 in total

Review 1. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

Authors: M E Muggli; J L Forster; R D Hurt; J L Repace
Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 9.308

2. Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions.

Authors: L A Bero; T Montini; K Bryan-Jones; C Mangurian
Journal: Tob Control Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 7.552

3. Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment.

Authors: Marieka S Schotland; Lisa A Bero
Journal: Risk Anal Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.000

4. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents.

Authors: J Drope; S Chapman
Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.710

5. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors:
Journal: JAMA Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 56.272

6. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors: D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal: J Health Polit Policy Law Date: 1996 Impact factor: 2.265

7. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.

Authors: D Rennie; V Yank; L Emanuel
Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272

8. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.

Authors: T Hirayama
Journal: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) Date: 1981-01-17

9. Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer.

Authors:
Journal: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) Date: 1981-10-03

10. Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies.

Authors: A L Misakian; L A Bero
Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-07-15 Impact factor: 56.272

23 in total

Review 1. Tobacco industry manipulation of research.

Authors: Lisa A Bero
Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792

2. Passive smoking: background must be examined.

Authors: Martin McKee
Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-08-30

3. Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population.

Authors: Robert C Klesges; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman; Margaret Debon; G Wayne Talcott; Robert J Vanecek
Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2009-06-15

Review 4. Tobacco industry influence on the definition of tobacco related disorders by the American Psychiatric Association.

Authors: M D Neuman; A Bitton; S A Glantz
Journal: Tob Control Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.552

5. From strange bedfellows to natural allies: the shifting allegiance of fire service organisations in the push for federal fire-safe cigarette legislation.

Authors: E M Barbeau; G Kelder; S Ahmed; V Mantuefel; E D Balbach
Journal: Tob Control Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9. ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia.

Authors: E K Tong; S A Glantz
Journal: Tob Control Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 7.552

10. Compromise or capitulation? US Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over tobacco products.

Authors: Stanton A Glantz; Richard Barnes; Sharon Y Eubanks
Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 11.069

How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.