Literature DB >> 11527774

The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

M E Muggli1, J L Forster, R D Hurt, J L Repace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This review details the tobacco industry's scientific campaign aimed against policies addressing environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and efforts to undermine US regulatory agencies from approximately 1988 to 1993.
METHODS: The public availability of more than 40 million internal, once-secret tobacco company documents allowed an unedited and historical look at tobacco industry strategies.
RESULTS: The analysis showed that the tobacco industry went to great lengths to battle the ETS issue worldwide by camouflaging its involvement and creating an impression of legitimate, unbiased scientific research.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for further international monitoring of industry-produced science and for significant improvements in tobacco document accessibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11527774      PMCID: PMC1446797          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Tobacco industry does slow burn over EPA adviser.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry.

Authors:  S A Glantz; W W Parmley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Passive smoking and the risk of heart disease.

Authors:  K Steenland
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

6.  Tobacco science wars.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A rebuttal to the tobacco industry's paper, "Cigarette Smoke and the Nonsmoker".

Authors:  V Ernster; D Burns
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.222

8.  Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan.

Authors:  T Hirayama
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-01-17

9.  Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health.

Authors:  J L Repace; A H Lowrey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  58 in total

1.  Second hand smoke and risk assessment: what was in it for the tobacco industry?

Authors:  N Hirschhorn; S A Bialous
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Hong; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

Review 3.  ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standards.

Authors:  S Aguinaga Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  "Conclusions about exposure to ETS and health that will be unhelpful to us": how the tobacco industry attempted to delay and discredit the 1997 Australian National Health and Medical Research Council report on passive smoking.

Authors:  L Trotter; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  A cigarette manufacturer and a managed care company collaborate to censor health information targeted at employees.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Richard D Hurt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The tobacco industry's use of Wall Street analysts in shaping policy.

Authors:  B C Alamar; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  How acute and reversible are the cardiovascular risks of secondhand smoke?

Authors:  Terry F Pechacek; Stephen Babb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

8.  The "father of stress" meets "big tobacco": Hans Selye and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Mark P Petticrew; Kelley Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Ernesto M Sebrié; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb

10.  Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies.

Authors:  L L Mandel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.