Literature DB >> 8755700

Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.

J E Mazur1.   

Abstract

A discrete-trials adjusting-delay procedure was used to investigate the conditions under which pigeons might show a preference for partial reinforcement over 100% reinforcement, an effect reported in a number of previous experiments. A peck on a red key always led to a delay with red houselights and then food. In each condition, the duration of the red-houselight delay was adjusted to estimate an indifference point. In 100% reinforcement conditions, a peck on a green key always led to a delay with green houselights and then food. In partial-reinforcement conditions, a peck on the green key led either to the green houselights and food or to white houselights and no food. In some phases of the experiment, statistically significant preference for partial reinforcement over 100% reinforcement was found, but this effect was observed in only about half of the pigeons. The effect was largely eliminated when variability in the delay stimulus colors was equated for 50% reinforcement conditions and 100% reinforcement conditions. Idiosyncratic preferences for certain colors or for stimulus variability may be at least partially responsible for the effect.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8755700      PMCID: PMC1284553          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1996.66-63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Theories of probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  15 in total

1.  Toward an operant model of power in organizations.

Authors:  Sonia M Goltz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  Suboptimal choice behavior by pigeons.

Authors:  Jessica P Stagner; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  Maladaptive choice behaviour by pigeons: an animal analogue and possible mechanism for gambling (sub-optimal human decision-making behaviour).

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jessica Stagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Preference for 50% reinforcement over 75% reinforcement by pigeons.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Jérôme J D Alessandri; Holly C Miller; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Procrastination in the pigeon: Can conditioned reinforcement increase the likelihood of human procrastination?

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jacob P Case; Danielle M Andrews
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

6.  Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

Authors:  L Valencia Torres; S da Costa Araújo; C M Olarte Sanchez; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Risky choice in pigeons: preference for amount variability using a token-reinforcement system.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The functional equivalence of two variants of the suboptimal choice task: choice proportion and response latency as measures of value.

Authors:  Alejandro Macías; Valeria V González; Armando Machado; Marco Vasconcelos
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Choice between reinforcer delays versus choice between reinforcer magnitudes: differential Fos expression in the orbital prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  S da Costa Araújo; S Body; L Valencia Torres; C M Olarte Sanchez; V K Bak; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.