Literature DB >> 21541116

Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.

L Valencia Torres1, S da Costa Araújo, C M Olarte Sanchez, S Body, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

Twelve rats made repeated choices on an adjusting-delay schedule between a smaller reinforcer (A) that was delivered immediately after a response and a larger reinforcer (B) that was delivered after a delay which increased or decreased by 20% depending on the subject's choices in successive blocks of trials. In two phases of the experiment (100 sessions and 40 sessions), reinforcer sizes were selected which enabled theoretical parameters expressing the rate of delay discounting and sensitivity to reinforcer size to be estimated from the ratio of the indifference delays obtained in the two phases. Indifference delays, calculated from adjusting delays in the last 10 sessions of each phase, were shorter when the sizes of A and B were 14 and 25 µl of a 0.6 M sucrose solution than when they were 25 and 100 µl of the same solution. The ratio of the indifference delays was significantly smaller than that predicted on the basis of an assumed linear relation between reinforcer size and instantaneous reinforcer value, consistent with a previous proposal that this relation may be hyperbolic in form. Estimates of the rate of delay discounting based on the ratio of the two indifference delays (mean, 0.08 s(-1)) were similar to values obtained previously using different intertemporal choice protocols. Estimates of the size-sensitivity parameter (mean 113 µl) were similar to estimates recently derived from performance on progressive-ratio schedules. In both phases of the experiment, adjusting delays in successive blocks of trials were analyzed using the Fourier transform. The power spectrum obtained from individual rats had a dominant frequency that corresponded to a period of oscillation of the adjusting delay between 30 and 100 trial blocks (mean, 78). Power in the dominant frequency band was highest in the early sessions of the first phase and declined with extended training. It is suggested that this experimental protocol may have utility in neurobehavioral studies of intertemporal choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourier transform; adjusting-delay schedule; delay discounting; intertemporal choice; lever press; rat; reinforcer magnitude

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21541116      PMCID: PMC3014781          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 2.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Do adjusting-amount and adjusting-delay procedures produce equivalent estimates of subjective value in pigeons?

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Anuj K Shah; Sara J Estle; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of real versus hypothetical reward on delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Neal S Hinvest; Ian M Anderson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  An additive-utility model of delay discounting.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  A dynamic developmental theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) predominantly hyperactive/impulsive and combined subtypes.

Authors:  Terje Sagvolden; Espen Borgå Johansen; Heidi Aase; Vivienne Ann Russell
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Ratio versus difference comparators in choice.

Authors:  J Gibbon; S Fairhurst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effect of disconnecting the orbital prefrontal cortex from the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice behaviour: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  G Bezzina; S Body; T H C Cheung; C L Hampson; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; I M Anderson; J F W Deakin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  5 in total

1.  Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k.

Authors:  Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.

Authors:  Justin R Yates
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Nucleus accumbens and delay discounting in rats: evidence from a new quantitative protocol for analysing inter-temporal choice.

Authors:  L Valencia-Torres; C M Olarte-Sánchez; S da Costa Araújo; S Body; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interactions between deliberation and delay-discounting in rats.

Authors:  Andrew E Papale; Jeffrey J Stott; Nathaniel J Powell; Paul S Regier; A David Redish
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.