Literature DB >> 8754221

Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy?

A Eyre-Walker1.   

Abstract

The levels of synonymous codon bias is shown to be positively correlated to gene length in Escherichia coli genes which are thought to be expressed at similar levels; these are genes whose products are present in multimeric proteins in equimolar amounts. It is argued that the positive correlation could be caused by selection to avoid missense errors during translation. Since the cost of producing a protein is proportional to its length, selection in favor of codons which increase accuracy should be greater in longer genes, and long genes should therefore have higher synonymous codon bias. It is also shown that there is variation in synonymous codon use which is independent of either expression level, gene length, amino acid composition, or chromosomal location. This variation is consistent with selection for translational accuracy but may have other origins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8754221     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  88 in total

1.  Comparison of intron-containing and intron-lacking human genes elucidates putative exonic splicing enhancers.

Authors:  A Fedorov; S Saxonov; L Fedorova; I Daizadeh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes.

Authors:  Alexei Fedorov; Serge Saxonov; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Gradients in nucleotide and codon usage along Escherichia coli genes.

Authors:  S D Hooper; O G Berg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes.

Authors:  Swaine L Chen; William Lee; Alison K Hottes; Lucy Shapiro; Harley H McAdams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Metabolic and translational efficiency in microbial organisms.

Authors:  Douglas W Raiford; Esley M Heizer; Robert V Miller; Travis E Doom; Michael L Raymer; Dan E Krane
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Estimating the "effective number of codons": the Wright way of determining codon homozygosity leads to superior estimates.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Hong Qin; Wei Biao Wu; Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Widespread positive selection in synonymous sites of mammalian genes.

Authors:  Alissa M Resch; Liran Carmel; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Svetlana A Shabalina; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.