Literature DB >> 15611189

Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Hong Qin1, Wei Biao Wu, Josep M Comeron, Martin Kreitman, Wen-Hsiung Li.   

Abstract

To study the roles of translational accuracy, translational efficiency, and the Hill-Robertson effect in codon usage bias, we studied the intragenic spatial distribution of synonymous codon usage bias in four prokaryotic (Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Sulfolobus tokodaii, and Thermotoga maritima) and two eukaryotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster) genomes. We generated supersequences at each codon position across genes in a genome and computed the overall bias at each codon position. By quantitatively evaluating the trend of spatial patterns using isotonic regression, we show that in yeast and prokaryotic genomes, codon usage bias increases along translational direction, which is consistent with purifying selection against nonsense errors. Fruit fly genes show a nearly symmetric M-shaped spatial pattern of codon usage bias, with less bias in the middle and both ends. The low codon usage bias in the middle region is best explained by interference (the Hill-Robertson effect) between selections at different codon positions. In both yeast and fruit fly, spatial patterns of codon usage bias are characteristically different from patterns of GC-content variations. Effect of expression level on the strength of codon usage bias is more conspicuous than its effect on the shape of the spatial distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611189      PMCID: PMC1448744          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.030866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  87 in total

Review 1.  Gene expression and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Interactions between natural selection, recombination and gene density in the genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jody Hey; Richard M Kliman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis.

Authors:  N Galtier; G Piganeau; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Preferential usage of some minor codons in bacteria.

Authors:  H Ohno; H Sakai; T Washio; M Tomita
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-10-03       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  The relationship between third-codon position nucleotide content, codon bias, mRNA secondary structure and gene expression in the drosophilid alcohol dehydrogenase genes Adh and Adhr.

Authors:  D B Carlini; Y Chen; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The frequency distribution of nucleotide variation in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Molecular population genetics and evolution of a prion-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M A Jensen; H L True; Y O Chernoff; S Lindquist
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Evolutionary conservation of otd/Otx2 transcription factor action: a genome-wide microarray analysis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Haiqiong Montalta-He; Ronny Leemans; Thomas Loop; Martin Strahm; Ulrich Certa; Michael Primig; Dario Acampora; Antonio Simeone; Heinrich Reichert
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  37 in total

1.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Measuring and detecting molecular adaptation in codon usage against nonsense errors during protein translation.

Authors:  Michael A Gilchrist; Premal Shah; Russell Zaretzki
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Background selection in single genes may explain patterns of codon bias.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species.

Authors:  Eyal Elyashiv; Kevin Bullaughey; Shmuel Sattath; Yosef Rinott; Molly Przeworski; Guy Sella
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Interspecific and intragenic differences in codon usage bias among vertebrate myosin heavy-chain genes.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Bryan C Rourke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Grzegorz Kudla
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Relative codon adaptation index, a sensitive measure of codon usage bias.

Authors:  Soohyun Lee; Seyeon Weon; Sooncheol Lee; Changwon Kang
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 1.625

9.  Estimating selection intensity on synonymous codon usage in a nonequilibrium population.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Selection for minimization of translational frameshifting errors as a factor in the evolution of codon usage.

Authors:  Yang Huang; Eugene V Koonin; David J Lipman; Teresa M Przytycka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.