Literature DB >> 11861911

Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes.

Alexei Fedorov1, Serge Saxonov, Walter Gilbert.   

Abstract

Nucleotides surrounding a codon influence the choice of this particular codon from among the group of possible synonymous codons. The strongest influence on codon usage arises from the nucleotide immediately following the codon and is known as the N1 context. We studied the relative abundance of codons with N1 contexts in genes from four eukaryotes for which the entire genomes have been sequenced: Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans and Arabidopsis thaliana. For all the studied organisms it was found that 90% of the codons have a statistically significant N1 context-dependent codon bias. The relative abundance of each codon with an N1 context was compared with the relative abundance of the same 4mer oligonucleotide in the whole genome. This comparison showed that in about half of all cases the context-dependent codon bias could not be explained by the sequence composition of the genome. Ranking statistics were applied to compare context-dependent codon biases for codons from different synonymous groups. We found regularities in N1 context-dependent codon bias with respect to the codon nucleotide composition. Codons with the same nucleotides in the second and third positions and the same N1 context have a statistically significant correlation of their relative abundances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11861911      PMCID: PMC101244          DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.5.1192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  28 in total

1.  The nonrandom location of synonymous codons suggests that reading frame-independent forces have patterned codon preferences.

Authors:  M A Antezana; M Kreitman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  EID: the Exon-Intron Database-an exhaustive database of protein-coding intron-containing genes.

Authors:  S Saxonov; I Daizadeh; A Fedorov; W Gilbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Comparison of intron-containing and intron-lacking human genes elucidates putative exonic splicing enhancers.

Authors:  A Fedorov; S Saxonov; L Fedorova; I Daizadeh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  mRNA export: the long and winding road.

Authors:  C N Cole
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  A comparison of the Celera and Ensembl predicted gene sets reveals little overlap in novel genes.

Authors:  J B Hogenesch; K A Ching; S Batalov; A I Su; J R Walker; Y Zhou; S A Kay; P G Schultz; M P Cooke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Sense codons are found in specific contexts.

Authors:  M Yarus; L S Folley
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1985-04-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy; M Jacobzone; R Mercier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Codon usage can affect efficiency of translation of genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Robinson; R Lilley; S Little; J S Emtage; G Yarranton; P Stephens; A Millican; M Eaton; G Humphreys
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Codon selection in yeast.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen; B D Hall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  36 in total

1.  Virus attenuation by genome-scale changes in codon pair bias.

Authors:  J Robert Coleman; Dimitris Papamichail; Steven Skiena; Bruce Futcher; Eckard Wimmer; Steffen Mueller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Comparative investigation of the various determinants that influence the codon and amino acid usage patterns in the genus Bifidobacterium.

Authors:  Ayan Roy; Subhasish Mukhopadhyay; Indrani Sarkar; Arnab Sen
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Transfer RNA gene numbers may not be completely responsible for the codon usage bias in asparagine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine in the high expression genes in bacteria.

Authors:  Siddhartha Sankar Satapathy; Malay Dutta; Alak Kumar Buragohain; Suvendra Kumar Ray
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Molecular mechanism of translational stalling by inhibitory codon combinations and poly(A) tracts.

Authors:  Petr Tesina; Laura N Lessen; Robert Buschauer; Jingdong Cheng; Colin Chih-Chien Wu; Otto Berninghausen; Allen R Buskirk; Thomas Becker; Roland Beckmann; Rachel Green
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Role of a cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte epitope-defined, alternative gag open reading frame in the pathogenesis of a murine retrovirus-induced immunodeficiency syndrome.

Authors:  Arti Gaur; William R Green
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Grzegorz Kudla
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  The effect of local nucleotides on synonymous codon usage in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genome.

Authors:  Robert W Cutler; Panuwan Chantawannakul
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  The Use of the Rare TTA Codon in Streptomyces Genes: Significance of the Codon Context?

Authors:  Serhii Silov; Nestor Zaburannyi; Maria Anisimova; Bohdan Ostash
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.461

9.  Adjacent Codons Act in Concert to Modulate Translation Efficiency in Yeast.

Authors:  Caitlin E Gamble; Christina E Brule; Kimberly M Dean; Stanley Fields; Elizabeth J Grayhack
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Universal pattern and diverse strengths of successive synonymous codon bias in three domains of life, particularly among prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Feng-Biao Guo; Yuan-Nong Ye; Hai-Long Zhao; Dan Lin; Wen Wei
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.