Literature DB >> 15965246

X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Nadia D Singh1, Jerel C Davis, Dmitri A Petrov.   

Abstract

Comparing patterns of molecular evolution between autosomes and sex chromosomes (such as X and W chromosomes) can provide insight into the forces underlying genome evolution. Here we investigate patterns of codon bias evolution on the X chromosome and autosomes in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. We demonstrate that X-linked genes have significantly higher codon bias compared to autosomal genes in both Drosophila and Caenorhabditis. Furthermore, genes that become X-linked evolve higher codon bias gradually, over tens of millions of years. We provide several lines of evidence that this elevation in codon bias is due exclusively to their chromosomal location and not to any other property of X-linked genes. We present two possible explanations for these observations. One possibility is that natural selection is more efficient on the X chromosome due to effective haploidy of the X chromosomes in males and persistently low effective numbers of reproducing males compared to that of females. Alternatively, X-linked genes might experience stronger natural selection for higher codon bias as a result of maladaptive reduction of their dosage engendered by the loss of the Y-linked homologs.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15965246      PMCID: PMC1456507          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.043497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  47 in total

1.  Effect of strong directional selection on weakly selected mutations at linked sites: implication for synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  Yuseob Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Does recombination improve selection on codon usage? Lessons from nematode and fly complete genomes.

Authors:  G Marais; D Mouchiroud; L Duret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The evolution of sex chromosomes.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Translational selection and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  The dosage compensation system of Drosophila is co-opted by newly evolved X chromosomes.

Authors:  I Marín; A Franke; G J Bashaw; B S Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes.

Authors:  A Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  B S Baker; M Gorman; I Marín
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into the Drosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein.

Authors:  David B Carlini; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at "silent" sites in Drosophila DNA.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Paucity of genes on the Drosophila X chromosome showing male-biased expression.

Authors:  Michael Parisi; Rachel Nuttall; Daniel Naiman; Gerard Bouffard; James Malley; Justen Andrews; Scott Eastman; Brian Oliver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  36 in total

1.  Recombination rates may affect the ratio of X to autosomal noncoding polymorphism in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of a distinct genomic domain in Drosophila: comparative analysis of the dot chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis.

Authors:  Wilson Leung; Christopher D Shaffer; Taylor Cordonnier; Jeannette Wong; Michelle S Itano; Elizabeth E Slawson Tempel; Elmer Kellmann; David Michael Desruisseau; Carolyn Cain; Robert Carrasquillo; Tien M Chusak; Katazyna Falkowska; Kelli D Grim; Rui Guan; Jacquelyn Honeybourne; Sana Khan; Louis Lo; Rebecca McGaha; Jevon Plunkett; Justin M Richner; Ryan Richt; Leah Sabin; Anita Shah; Anushree Sharma; Sonal Singhal; Fine Song; Christopher Swope; Craig B Wilen; Jeremy Buhler; Elaine R Mardis; Sarah C R Elgin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Studying patterns of recent evolution at synonymous sites and intronic sites in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Positive and purifying selection on the Drosophila Y chromosome.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Leonardo B Koerich; Antonio Bernardo Carvalho; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Jae Young Choi; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Recombination yet inefficient selection along the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup's fourth chromosome.

Authors:  J Roman Arguello; Yue Zhang; Tomoyuki Kado; Chuanzhu Fan; Ruoping Zhao; Hideki Innan; Wen Wang; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  A sequence motif enriched in regions bound by the Drosophila dosage compensation complex.

Authors:  Miguel Gallach; Vicente Arnau; Rodrigo Aldecoa; Ignacio Marín
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Faster-X adaptive protein evolution in house mice.

Authors:  Athanasios Kousathanas; Daniel L Halligan; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.