Literature DB >> 17522087

Widespread positive selection in synonymous sites of mammalian genes.

Alissa M Resch1, Liran Carmel, Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez, Aleksey Y Ogurtsov, Svetlana A Shabalina, Igor B Rogozin, Eugene V Koonin.   

Abstract

Evolution of protein sequences is largely governed by purifying selection, with a small fraction of proteins evolving under positive selection. The evolution at synonymous positions in protein-coding genes is not nearly as well understood, with the extent and types of selection remaining, largely, unclear. A statistical test to identify purifying and positive selection at synonymous sites in protein-coding genes was developed. The method compares the rate of evolution at synonymous sites (Ks) to that in intron sequences of the same gene after sampling the aligned intron sequences to mimic the statistical properties of coding sequences. We detected purifying selection at synonymous sites in approximately 28% of the 1,562 analyzed orthologous genes from mouse and rat, and positive selection in approximately 12% of the genes. Thus, the fraction of genes with readily detectable positive selection at synonymous sites is much greater than the fraction of genes with comparable positive selection at nonsynonymous sites, i.e., at the level of the protein sequence. Unlike other genes, the genes with positive selection at synonymous sites showed no correlation between Ks and the rate of evolution in nonsynonymous sites (Ka), indicating that evolution of synonymous sites under positive selection is decoupled from protein evolution. The genes with purifying selection at synonymous sites showed significant anticorrelation between Ks and expression level and breadth, indicating that highly expressed genes evolve slowly. The genes with positive selection at synonymous sites showed the opposite trend, i.e., highly expressed genes had, on average, higher Ks. For the genes with positive selection at synonymous sites, a significantly lower mRNA stability is predicted compared to the genes with negative selection. Thus, mRNA destabilization could be an important factor driving positive selection in nonsynonymous sites, probably, through regulation of expression at the level of mRNA degradation and, possibly, also translation rate. So, unexpectedly, we found that positive selection at synonymous sites of mammalian genes is substantially more common than positive selection at the level of protein sequences. Positive selection at synonymous sites might act through mRNA destabilization affecting mRNA levels and translation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17522087      PMCID: PMC2632937          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msm100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  57 in total

1.  OWEN: aligning long collinear regions of genomes.

Authors:  Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Mikhail A Roytberg; Svetlana A Shabalina; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Similar rates but different modes of sequence evolution in introns and at exonic silent sites in rodents: evidence for selectively driven codon usage.

Authors:  Jean-Vincent Chamary; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Selection in favor of nucleotides G and C diversifies evolution rates and levels of polymorphism at mammalian synonymous sites.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Aleksey Y Ogurtsov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Evaluation of an improved branch-site likelihood method for detecting positive selection at the molecular level.

Authors:  Jianzhi Zhang; Rasmus Nielsen; Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Translational selection and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution.

Authors:  W H Li
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Positive selection on the human genome.

Authors:  Eric J Vallender; Bruce T Lahn
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

View more
  45 in total

1.  Detecting positive and purifying selection at synonymous sites in yeast and worm.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Wanjun Gu; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  The human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB1): an evolutionary story in primates.

Authors:  Maria C Viana; William C Tavares; Ayslan C Brant; Mariana Boroni; Héctor N Seuánez
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Positive selection acting on splicing motifs reflects compensatory evolution.

Authors:  Shengdong Ke; Xiang H-F Zhang; Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Molecular evolution of PKD2 gene family in mammals.

Authors:  Chun Ye; Huan Sun; Wenhu Guo; Yuquan Wei; Qin Zhou
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Cut thy neighbor: cyclic birth and death of recombination hotspots via genetic conflict.

Authors:  Urban Friberg; William R Rice
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Complex interplay of evolutionary forces in the ladybird homeobox genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Evgeniy S Balakirev; Maria Anisimova; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Statistics and truth in phylogenomics.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Alan J Filipski; Fabia U Battistuzzi; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Translational selection is ubiquitous in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Fran Supek; Nives Skunca; Jelena Repar; Kristian Vlahovicek; Tomislav Smuc
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Genomic evidence for non-random endemic populations of decaying exons from mammalian genes.

Authors:  David Delima Morais; Paul M Harrison
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Learning a prior on regulatory potential from eQTL data.

Authors:  Su-In Lee; Aimée M Dudley; David Drubin; Pamela A Silver; Nevan J Krogan; Dana Pe'er; Daphne Koller
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.