Literature DB >> 8749732

MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.

A Giovagnoni1, E Paci, P Ercolani, B Kiefer, P Santino, A Piga.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare conventional spin-echo (CSE) T2-weighted (T2W) images with turbo spin-echo (TSE) T2W pulse sequences in their ability to detect focal liver lesions. Seventy-eight consecutive patients with focal liver lesions were entered into this study. All patients were imaged using the gradient-echo (GE) sequence with the breath-hold technique for T1-weighted (T1W) images, and CSE and TSE sequences for T2W images. Qualitative evaluation included lesion detection (number of lesions detected) and conspicuity (extent of visualization of lesional borders); quantitative evaluation included the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and the contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratio. TSE showed the best performance in terms of lesion detection; however, the difference between TSE and CSE was significant only in the case of benign cysts (p < 0.01). Conspicuity was higher with TSE and CSE, and lower with GE. The S/N and C/N ratios of the two T2W sequences were also comparable, and better than those of GE. However, the combined use of GE and TSE resulted in improved lesion detection. The results show that, because the acquisition time is greatly reduced with TSE sequences, these should be considered as first-line approach to magnetic resonance imaging of the liver for the study of focal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8749732     DOI: 10.1007/bf01771699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  22 in total

1.  The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI.

Authors:  R T Constable; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The pelvis: T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.

Authors:  H V Nghiem; R J Herfkens; I R Francis; F G Sommer; R B Jeffrey; K C Li; R M Steiner; G H Glover
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Contrast manipulation and artifact assessment of 2D and 3D RARE sequences.

Authors:  R V Mulkern; S T Wong; C Winalski; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  S A Mirowitz; J K Lee; E Gutierrez; J J Brown; J P Heiken; S S Eilenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dynamic MR imaging of the liver with Gd-DTPA: initial clinical results.

Authors:  R R Edelman; J B Siegel; A Singer; K Dupuis; H E Longmaid
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Some considerations for MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  L E Crooks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Focal hepatic lesions: comparative MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

Authors:  H V Steinberg; J J Alarcon; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast and conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.

Authors:  R N Low; I R Francis; J S Sigeti; T K Foo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Detection of hepatic metastases: analysis of pulse sequence performance in MR imaging.

Authors:  D D Stark; J Wittenberg; R R Edelman; M S Middleton; S Saini; R J Butch; T J Brady; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences.

Authors:  J V Catasca; S A Mirowitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.