Literature DB >> 2152980

Focal hepatic lesions: comparative MR imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

H V Steinberg1, J J Alarcon, M E Bernardino.   

Abstract

Twenty-nine patients with known or suspected malignancy were studied with identical T1-weighted (spin echo [SE] and inversion recovery [IR]) and T2-weighted SE magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 0.5 and 1.5 T to evaluate the relative sensitivities of these sequences for detecting focal hepatic lesions. At 0.5 T, 98 lesions were detected with the IR sequence, 86 with the T1-weighted SE sequence, and 96 with the T2-weighted sequence. At 1.5 T, 93 lesions were detected with the IR sequence, 70 with the T1-weighted SE sequence, and 99 with the T2-weighted sequence. Although the lack of pathologic correlation precluded establishment of true sensitivity and specificity rates, data showed that magnetic field strength resulted in no significant difference for detecting focal hepatic lesions. No single sequence was shown to be significantly superior, although the T1-weighted SE sequence at 1.5 T was significantly inferior to the other sequences for detecting focal hepatic lesions. T1-weighted SE imaging at 0.5 T was significantly inferior to T1-weighted IR and T2-weighted imaging at both magnetic field strengths for detecting focal lesions in the left lobe of the liver. The authors conclude that T1-weighted IR and T2-weighted sequences alone will result in optimal MR imaging for the detection of focal hepatic lesions at 0.5 and 1.5 T.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2152980     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2152980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  A Giovagnoni; E Paci; P Ercolani; B Kiefer; P Santino; A Piga
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  [Low-field magnetic resonance imaging : Just less expensive or completely different?]

Authors:  Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Liver MR imaging: comparison of respiratory triggered fast spin echo with T2-weighted spin-echo and inversion recovery.

Authors:  M T Keogan; C E Spritzer; E K Paulson; S S Paine; L Harris; J L Dahlke; J R MacFall
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

4.  Assessing the utility of low resolution brain imaging: treatment of infant hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Joshua R Harper; Venkateswararao Cherukuri; Tom O'Reilly; Mingzhao Yu; Edith Mbabazi-Kabachelor; Ronald Mulando; Kevin N Sheth; Andrew G Webb; Benjamin C Warf; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Vishal Monga; Steven J Schiff
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.881

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.