Literature DB >> 2816634

Dynamic MR imaging of the liver with Gd-DTPA: initial clinical results.

R R Edelman1, J B Siegel, A Singer, K Dupuis, H E Longmaid.   

Abstract

Gd-DTPA was evaluated as a hepatic contrast agent for MR imaging. Twenty-six consecutive patients referred for suspected masses in the liver were studied at 1.5 T. Fourteen patients had hepatic metastases and one patient each had cholangiocarcinoma and multicentric hepatocellular carcinoma. Four patients had cavernous hemangiomas and the remainder had other benign lesions. Diagnoses were proved by biopsy, sonography, or radionuclide scintigraphy in 23 cases and by autopsy in one case. Precontrast scans were obtained by using standard pulse sequences. In addition, breath-hold scans were obtained before and after bolus administration of 0.1 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA by using a multislice T1-weighted gradient-echo pulse sequence with an ultrashort echo time. Mean lesion-liver signal difference/noise increased by 50% (p less than .01) in the immediate postcontrast phase. In two of 26 cases, multiple additional lesions as small as 3 mm were detected after contrast administration that were not seen before contrast administration. In no case was lesion-liver contrast worsened on scans obtained immediately after administration of contrast material. However, on delayed scans, detection of lesions worsened in some cases because of equilibration of contrast material between liver and lesion. These initial clinical results suggest that enhancement with Gd-DTPA is a practical method for improving lesion-liver contrast and has the potential to improve the accuracy of MR imaging in the liver. However, optimized fast imaging techniques are required for best results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2816634     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.6.1213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  5 in total

1.  Breathhold imaging of the upper abdomen using a circular polarized-array coil: comparison with standard body coil imaging.

Authors:  J Gauger; N G Holzknecht; C A Lackerbauer; H Sittek; K E Fiedler; R Petsch; M Reiser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  MR imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison between turbo spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences.

Authors:  A Giovagnoni; E Paci; P Ercolani; B Kiefer; P Santino; A Piga
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1995 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Hepatic metastases: CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.

Authors:  V G Vassiliades; W D Foley; J Alarcon; T Lawson; S Erickson; J B Kneeland; H V Steinberg; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

4.  Contributions of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Gastroenterological Practice: MRIs for GIs.

Authors:  Christopher G Roth; Dina Halegoua-De Marzio; Flavius F Guglielmo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Bile duct disease: prospective comparison of ERCP, CT, and fat suppression MRI.

Authors:  R C Semelka; J P Shoenut; M A Kroeker; H Hricak; G Y Minuk; C S Yaffe; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.