Literature DB >> 8733432

Population evolution on a multiplicative single-peak fitness landscape.

G Woodcock1, P G Higgs.   

Abstract

A theory for evolution of either gene sequences or molecular sequences must take into account that a population consists of a finite number of individuals with related sequences. Such a population will not behave in the deterministic way expected for an infinite population, nor will it behave as in adaptive walk models, where the whole of the population is represented by a single sequence. Here we study a model for evolution of population in a fitness landscape with a single fitness peak. This landscape is simple enough for finite size population effects to be studied in detail. Each of the N individuals in the population is represented by a sequence of L genes which may either be advantageous or disadvantageous. The fitness of an individual with k disadvantageous genes is Wk = (1-s)k, where s determines the strength of selection. In the limit L-->infinity, the model reduces to the problem of Muller's Ratchet: the population moves away from the fitness peak at a constant rate due to the accumulation of disadvantageous mutations. For finite length sequences, a population placed initially at the fitness peak will evolve away from the peak until a balance is reached between mutation and selection. From then on the population will wander through a spherical shell in sequence space at a constant mean Hamming distance <k> from the optimum sequence. We give an approximate theory for the way <k> depends on N, L, s, and the mutation rate u. This is found to agree well with numerical simulation. Selection is less effective on small populations, so <k> increases as N decreases. Our simulations also show that the mean overlap between gene sequences separated by a time of t generations is of the form Q(t) = Q infinity + (Q0-Q infinity)exp(-2ut), which means that the rate of evolution within the spherical shell is independent of the selection strength. We give a simplified model which can be solved exactly for which Q(t) has precisely this form. We then consider the limit L-->infinity keeping U = uL constant. We suppose that each mutation may be favourable with probability p, or unfavourable with probability 1-p. We show that for p less than a critical value pc, the population decreases in fitness for all values of U, whereas for pc < p < 1/2, the population increases in fitness for small U and decreases in fitness for large U. In this case there is an optimum non-zero value of U at which the fitness increases most rapidly, and natural selection will favour species with non-zero mutation rates.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8733432     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  23 in total

1.  The rate of adaptation in asexuals.

Authors:  H A Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes.

Authors:  David C Krakauer; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolutionary dynamics of RNA-like replicator systems: A bioinformatic approach to the origin of life.

Authors:  Nobuto Takeuchi; Paulien Hogeweg
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The traveling-wave approach to asexual evolution: Muller's ratchet and speed of adaptation.

Authors:  Igor M Rouzine; Eric Brunet; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Loss of least-loaded class in asexual populations due to drift and epistasis.

Authors:  Kavita Jain
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The fixation probability of rare mutators in finite asexual populations.

Authors:  C Scott Wylie; Cheol-Min Ghim; David Kessler; Herbert Levine
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Surviving the bottleneck: transmission mutants and the evolution of microbial populations.

Authors:  Andreas Handel; Matthew R Bennett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The evolutionarily stable distribution of fitness effects.

Authors:  Daniel P Rice; Benjamin H Good; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Impacts of mutation effects and population size on mutation rate in asexual populations: a simulation study.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Baolin Mu; Zhuoran Huang; Mingjing Zhang; Xiaojuan Wang; Shiheng Tao
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Lethal mutagenesis in a structured environment.

Authors:  Shelby H Steinmeyer; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.