Literature DB >> 8703148

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests.

A C Poen1, M de Brauw, R J Felt-Bersma, D de Jong, M A Cuesta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy and its effect on anorectal function investigations.
METHODS: Twelve patients with complete rectal prolapse without constipation underwent laparoscopic rectopexy. Pre- and postoperative evaluation included scoring of incontinence, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography.
RESULTS: No recurrences of rectal prolapse were seen (median follow-up 19 months). Continence improved in eight of nine preoperatively incontinent patients. Two patients had mild constipation after surgery. Median maximum basal pressure measured by anorectal manometry increased from 20 to 25 mmHg (p = 0.005) and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex improved in seven patients (p = 0.03). Rectal sensitivity did not change significantly. Endosonography showed asymmetry and thickening of the internal anal sphincter and submucosa preoperatively. After surgery the maximum internal anal sphincter thickness decreased from 3.0 mm to 2.6 mm (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic rectopexy improved continence in our patients. Anorectal function tests show a partial recovery of the internal anal sphincter. Laparoscopic rectopexy combines the low morbidity of minimal invasive surgery with the good outcome of abdominal rectopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703148     DOI: 10.1007/BF00188480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Endosonographic variations in the normal internal anal sphincter.

Authors:  S J Burnett; C I Bartram
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

Authors:  G Brodén; A Dolk; B Holmström
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic rectopexy.

Authors:  M A Cuesta; P J Borgstein; D de Jong; S Meijer
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-12

4.  Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome.

Authors:  M Scaglia; S Fasth; T Hallgren; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia. Technique and implications.

Authors:  I R Berman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  O B Johansen; S D Wexner; N Daniel; J J Nogueras; D G Jagelman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography.

Authors:  M A Cuesta; S Meijer; E J Derksen; H Boutkan; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  J L McCue; J P Thomson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  M R Keighley; J W Fielding; J Alexander-Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Advantages of a modified technique.

Authors:  J P Lechaux; D Lechaux; M Perez
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

2.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Rectocele repair improves evacuation and prolapse complaints independent of anorectal function and colonic transit time.

Authors:  C E J Sloots; A J Meulen; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Clinical examination remains more important than anorectal function tests to identify treatable conditions in women with constipation.

Authors:  T J Lam; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Critical reappraisal of anorectal function tests in patients with faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatment.

Authors:  T J Lam; C J J Mulder; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectovaginopexy for rectal prolapse: a prospective cohort study on feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Werner A Draaisma; Dorothée H Nieuwenhuis; Lucas W M Janssen; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-01-04

7.  High-grade hemorrhoids requiring surgical treatment are common after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  J J van Iersel; H A Formijne Jonkers; P M Verheijen; W A Draaisma; E C J Consten; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.