Literature DB >> 8055726

Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome.

M Scaglia1, S Fasth, T Hallgren, S Nordgren, T Oresland, L Hultén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of surgical technique on functional and manovolumetric results in patients treated with Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy.
METHODS: The lateral ligaments were completely divided (the Wells procedure) in 16 patients and preserved (the Ripstein procedure) in 16 patients. Clinical and physiologic assessment were performed before and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation.
RESULTS: Improvement of continence was similar. Bowel regulation problems which were unchanged after the Ripstein procedure increased significantly after the Wells procedure (P < 0.01). Rectal volume became reduced in the group who received the Wells procedure (225 ml vs. 115 ml, P < 0.05 at one year), but remained unchanged after receiving the Ripstein procedure. The pressure thresholds required to elicit sensation of rectal filling and defecation urge were increased after the Wells procedure (15 cm of H2O vs. 25 cm of H2O, P < 0.05 and 25 cm of H2O vs. 45 cm of H2O, P < 0.05, respectively). In the Ripstein group there was only a slight increase of the threshold for urge (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The Wells procedure was followed by severe rectal dysfunction accompanied by increased constipation and evacuation problems. The Ripstein procedure, preserving the lateral ligaments, appears not to affect such symptoms adversely. On the other hand, improvement is not likely to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8055726     DOI: 10.1007/bf02050146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients.

Authors:  A D'Hoore; F Penninckx
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Complications and reinterventions after surgery for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Mario Pescatori; Giovanni Milito; Marina Fiorino; Federica Cadeddu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comment on: Stapled transanal resection of the rectum (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome.

Authors:  C Harmston; O M Jones; C Cunningham; I Lindsey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; G Weyand; J Heiligers; L Heumuller; L Barthelmes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Resection rectopexy--laparoscopic neuromapping reveals neurogenic pathways to the lower segment of the rectum: preliminary results.

Authors:  Werner Kneist; Daniel W Kauff; Gert Naumann; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Long-term outcomes of robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Agathe Postillon; Cyril Perrenot; Adeline Germain; Marie-Lorraine Scherrer; Cyrille Buisset; Laurent Brunaud; Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A new technique for suture rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  C A H Liyanage; G Rathnayake; K I Deen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Clinical and functional outcome of laparoscopic posterior rectopexy (Wells) for full-thickness rectal prolapse. A prospective study.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dulucq; Pascal Wintringer; Ahmad Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.