Literature DB >> 6831177

Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients.

M R Keighley, J W Fielding, J Alexander-Williams.   

Abstract

One hundred and six consecutive patients were seen between January 1973 and January 1982 with a circumferential full thickness rectal prolapse. One hundred were treated by abdominal rectopexy using a rectangular sling of monofilament knitted polypropylene (Marlex) mesh sutured to the sacrum and to the lateral ligaments of the mobilized rectum. There were only 9 men in the series and 23 per cent of the patients were over the age of 80 years. Sixty-seven of the patients gave a history of faecal incontinence. Previous unsuccessful treatment for rectal prolapse included a Thiersch wire or a Silastic perianal sling in 19, electrical therapy in 12, rectopexy with polyvinyl alcohol sponge (Ivalon) in 5 and pelvic floor repair in 2. There were no operative deaths following Marlex mesh rectopexy. Twelve patients had their operation performed under spinal anaesthesia because they were considered unfit for general anaesthesia. No patient developed a recurrent rectal prolapse, but 24 of the 67 patients who had incontinence experienced persistent incontinence after rectopexy (36 per cent); 10 of these patients subsequently had a postanal repair with good results. Rectopexy had no influence on anal canal pressures. Marlex mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective operation for rectal prolapse. It appears to be superior to other operations in that, so far, there has been no recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6831177     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800700415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  27 in total

1.  [Anterior and posterior rectopexy with levator repair in patients with rectal prolapse and incontinence].

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; J Heiligers; D Kossivakis
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect?

Authors:  H C Kuijpers
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Délorme's operation for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A M Abulafi; I W Sherman; R V Fiddian; R L Rothwell-Jackson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.

Authors:  G Brodén; A Dolk; B Holmström
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  S Athanasiadis; G Weyand; J Heiligers; L Heumuller; L Barthelmes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Surgical technique in prolapse of the rectum.

Authors:  J A Solla; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1989

8.  SURGERY FOR COMPLETE RECTAL PROLAPSE: A SIMPLIFIED APPROACH.

Authors:  A K Chaturvedi; P S Choudhury; S S Chauhan; M M Harjai
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

9.  Complete rectal prolapse--the results of Ivalon sponge rectopexy.

Authors:  J R Anderson; B G Wilson; T G Parks
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  The clinical contribution of integrated laboratory and ambulatory anorectal physiology assessment in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  R Farouk; D C Bartolo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.