Literature DB >> 8348868

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.

O B Johansen1, S D Wexner, N Daniel, J J Nogueras, D G Jagelman.   

Abstract

Between April 1989 and October 1991, 20 consecutive patients underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy and coloanal anastomosis for full-thickness rectal prolapse. These 16 females and 4 males, with a mean age of 82 (range, 68-101) years, were evaluated by detailed functional assessment and physiologic testing. A grading scale from 0 to 24 was based upon the frequency and type of incontinence, 0 representing full continence. The mean preoperative continence score was 14.5, while the mean postoperative continence score was 8.4. The mean length of resected rectosigmoid was 23 cm. There was one postoperative death and one significant complication, a postoperative pelvic hematoma that required reoperation. There were no full-thickness recurrences at a mean follow-up of 26 months. Six of the 10 patients who underwent preoperative pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) testing had evidence of severe neuropathy (latencies greater than 2.5 milliseconds). Prolonged PNTML, however, was not shown to be an accurate predictor of postoperative incontinence because four of the six patients with neuropathy regained excellent to good control. In conclusion, perineal rectosigmoidectomy is a safe operation for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse in the elderly patient. Improved postoperative continence was noted in 90 percent of patients, with improvement seen even in those patients with severe pudendal neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8348868     DOI: 10.1007/bf02048369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  17 in total

1.  Rectal prolapse: which surgical option is appropriate?

Authors:  T H K Schiedeck; O Schwandner; J Scheele; S Farke; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Scott D Goldstein; Pinckney J Maxwell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

3.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

4.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  David P O'Brien
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-05

5.  Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Franz G Bader; Markus Kleemann; Hamed Esnaashari; Ralf Bouchard; Philipp Hildebrand; Erik Schlöricke; Hans-Peter Bruch; Uwe J Roblick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Closed rectopexy with transanal resection for complete rectal prolapse in adults.

Authors:  Ahmed E Lasheen; Samy Khalifa; Salah M El Askry; Awni A Elzeftawy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Rectal Prolapse in Women-Outcomes of Perineal and Abdominal Approaches.

Authors:  Michal Mik; Radzislaw Trzcinski; Ryszard Kujawski; Lukasz Dziki; Marcin Tchorzewski; Adam Dziki
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 8.  Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation.

Authors:  C H Knowles; M Scott; P J Lunniss
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Perineal stapled prolapse resection for external rectal prolapse: is it worthwhile in the long-term?

Authors:  C Tschuor; P Limani; A Nocito; D Dindo; P-A Clavien; D Hahnloser
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  Pediatric Rectal Prolapse.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rentea; Shawn D St Peter
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2018-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.