Literature DB >> 11307100

Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

T T Zittel1, K Manncke, S Haug, J F Schäfer, M E Kreis, H D Becker, E C Jehle.   

Abstract

We investigated the functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 29 patients at least 12 months postoperatively. Twenty patients were evaluated completely pre- and postoperatively (median 22 months postoperatively, range 12 to 54 months). Six patients were interviewed by telephone, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient died of causes unrelated to rectal prolapse. Patients underwent a proctologic examination, anoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, fluoroscopic defecography, and anorectal manometry pre- and postoperatively, and an additional standardized interview postoperatively. Anorectal manometry showed a significant increase in maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures postoperatively (resting pressure 72 +/- 8 vs. 95 +/- 13 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.046; squeeze pressure 105 +/- 17 vs. 142 +/- 19 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.035), and continence improved postoperatively (Wexner incontinence score 6.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.8 pre- vs. postoperatively, P = 0.02). Twenty (77%) of 26 patients were satisfied with the operative result, but functional morbidity was observed in four patients, with two patients complaining of severe evacuation problems. Rectal prolapse recurred in one patient 42 months postoperatively (recurrence rate 1 [3.8%] of 26 patients). Functional results were very similar to those obtained after open rectopexy, with symptoms of prolapse and incontinence improved in the great majority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11307100     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80114-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  52 in total

Review 1.  ABC of colorectal diseases. Rectal prolapse and associated conditions.

Authors:  N J Andrews; D J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-25

2.  Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse.

Authors:  R D Madoff; J G Williams; W D Wong; D A Rothenberger; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  F Agachan; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  J Sayfan; M Pinho; J Alexander-Williams; M R Keighley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic rectopexy.

Authors:  M A Cuesta; P J Borgstein; D de Jong; S Meijer
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-12

6.  Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Influence of surgical technique on functional outcome.

Authors:  M Scaglia; S Fasth; T Hallgren; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests.

Authors:  A C Poen; M de Brauw; R J Felt-Bersma; D de Jong; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients.

Authors:  A Mellgren; S Bremmer; C Johansson; A Dolk; R Udén; S O Ahlbäck; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Abnormalities of colonic function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

Authors:  M R Keighley; P J Shouler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature.

Authors:  F Cadeddu; P Sileri; M Grande; E De Luca; L Franceschilli; G Milito
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; J Hubert; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Heemskerk; Nicole D Bouvy; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Primary and repeated perineal stapled prolapse resection.

Authors:  D Raahave; A K Jensen; L Dammegaard; I K Pedersen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Rectal prolapse: a 10-year experience.

Authors:  Kerry Hammond; David E Beck; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; Alan E Timmcke; Terry C Hicks
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2007

6.  Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients.

Authors:  M Carpelan-Holmström; O Kruuna; T Scheinin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Stapled transanal rectal resection for symptomatic intussusception: morphological and functional outcome.

Authors:  Reinhold A Lang; Sonja Buhmann; Christine Lautenschlager; Mario H Müller; Andreas Lienemann; Karl-Walter Jauch; Martin E Kreis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Authors:  Dominique E N M de Hoog; Jeroen Heemskerk; Fred H M Nieman; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G M I Baeten; Nicole D Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study.

Authors:  Y Kariv; C P Delaney; S Casillas; J Hammel; J Nocero; J Bast; K Brady; V W Fazio; A J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Eung Jin Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.